2014
DOI: 10.1515/dma-2014-0021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Method of synthesis of easily testable circuits admitting single fault detection tests of constant length

Abstract: It is constructively proved that any nonconstant Boolean function may be realized (over an arbitrary complete basis of gates) by a testable combinational circuit admitting (under single inverse or arbitrary constant faults at outputs of gates) a single fault detection test set whose cardinality does not exceed 4.Keywords: circuit of functional elements, single fault detection test, constant fault at the output of gate, Shannon function, length of a test, easily testable circuit.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the functions , 0, 1 are distinct, the test must contain a tuplẽ1 such that (̃1) = and a tuplẽ2 such that (̃2) = . Note that (̃2) = , (7) since if (̃2) = then the stuck-at fault of the type at the output of the gate can not be detected on the input̃2 and = (̃2) = (̃2) = , which is impossible. If (̃1) = then the stuck-at fault of the type of the gate can not be detected using inputs̃1,̃2, thus the test must contain one more tuple, hence | | ⩾ 3, as it was required to prove.…”
Section: Theorem 5 For Any Boolean Function (̃) That Can Not Be Reprmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the functions , 0, 1 are distinct, the test must contain a tuplẽ1 such that (̃1) = and a tuplẽ2 such that (̃2) = . Note that (̃2) = , (7) since if (̃2) = then the stuck-at fault of the type at the output of the gate can not be detected on the input̃2 and = (̃2) = (̃2) = , which is impossible. If (̃1) = then the stuck-at fault of the type of the gate can not be detected using inputs̃1,̃2, thus the test must contain one more tuple, hence | | ⩾ 3, as it was required to prove.…”
Section: Theorem 5 For Any Boolean Function (̃) That Can Not Be Reprmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result from [5] was further generalized by S. S. Kolyada for the case of an arbitrary functionally complete finite basis ( [6]). Kolyada's result was improved by D. S. Romanov who proved in [7] that for any functionally complete basis it holds that ; 0,1 , ( ) ⩽ 4 (however the paper cited used a different definition of an irredundant circuit). For the case of complete fault detection tests N. P. Redkin in [8,9] showed that for any complete finite basis 2 it holds that…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%