2012
DOI: 10.1134/s1063771012060061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Method for monitoring slow dynamics recovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some typical nonlinear manifestations in resonance frequency testing are the downward shift of the frequency and the increase in attenuation with increasing amplitudes (fast dynamics) [3][4][5]. The logarithmic recovery of this frequency shift with time after a stress or temperature disturbance may also be studied (slow dynamics) [6][7][8]. Furthermore, non-linear characteristics can be revealed by studying the behavior of higher harmonics and interference (modulation) between different frequencies [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some typical nonlinear manifestations in resonance frequency testing are the downward shift of the frequency and the increase in attenuation with increasing amplitudes (fast dynamics) [3][4][5]. The logarithmic recovery of this frequency shift with time after a stress or temperature disturbance may also be studied (slow dynamics) [6][7][8]. Furthermore, non-linear characteristics can be revealed by studying the behavior of higher harmonics and interference (modulation) between different frequencies [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This relationship is based on the premise that the deformation strain is the main factor affecting the nonlinear elasticity of rocks [29]. The nonlinearity of rocks becomes significant when the strain is of the order of a microstrain (10 −6 ) [10,29,30]. Thus, we prescribe a fracture energy that changes significantly once the strain is above 10 −6 .…”
Section: B Thermodynamics-based Parametrizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Haller and Hedberg (Haller & Hedberg, 2008) used a constant strain frequency sweep measurement, and compared the results with the constant force frequency sweep, although the method allows disentangling the material conditioning effect. In a second study, Haller and Hedberg (Haller & Hedberg, 2012) applied a high strain amplitude input at the resonant frequency during 30 minutes in order to induce a material conditioning; thereafter the material nonlinearity was probed at low strain levels for short periods of time at a discrete time 0.2 into the resonator, alternated with 5 seconds of high strain conditioning and so on, in order to determine the resonant frequency. The process was repeated by setting the discrete time point at a higher value.…”
Section: -22mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the investigation of careful slow dynamic experiments are time consuming (Haller & Hedberg, 2012;Haller & Hedberg, 2008). Besides, the repeatability of experiments require long rests between tests and controlled temperature and moisture environments (Ten Cate, Duran, & Shankland, 2002).…”
Section: -22mentioning
confidence: 99%