2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-16901-4_24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Method for Formal Verification of Soft-Error Tolerance Mechanisms in Pipelined Microprocessors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Abstractions of cores that can have more than two BB in execution can be constructed similarly. Note that Correspondence Checking has already been applied efficiently to formally verify individual cores of many architectures: single issue pipelined [21 -24, 28], in-order superscalar [23,24,26,28], out-of-order superscalar [27,30], and VLIW [25,28], including designs with soft-error tolerance mechanisms [42], reconfigurable functional units [43], arrays of reconfigurable functional units [44], and multithreaded execution [45].…”
Section: Abstraction Of Each Corementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Abstractions of cores that can have more than two BB in execution can be constructed similarly. Note that Correspondence Checking has already been applied efficiently to formally verify individual cores of many architectures: single issue pipelined [21 -24, 28], in-order superscalar [23,24,26,28], out-of-order superscalar [27,30], and VLIW [25,28], including designs with soft-error tolerance mechanisms [42], reconfigurable functional units [43], arrays of reconfigurable functional units [44], and multithreaded execution [45].…”
Section: Abstraction Of Each Corementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A VLIW processor imitating the Intel Itanium [12,20] in many features, and that could have more than 200 RISC-like instructions in execution, was formally verified in [25,39]. Techniques for automatic formal verification of pipelined processors with hardware mechanisms for soft-error tolerance [4,9] were presented in [42], and with multithreaded execution in [45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%