Method Comparison Analysis Simple Additive Weighting (Saw) With Weighted Product (Wp) Method in Supporting the Decision to Accept New Employees

Abstract

Employee selection is the first step in a company or agency that aims to obtain qualified and competent human resources that will serve and do all the work on an instinct. The process of selection of prospective employees has two decisions that are accepted and rejected. When an agency or company is unable to determine the human resources that fit the required criteria, it will be very detrimental for an agency or company more than the number of prospective employees who register will be troublesome in terms of calculation and determining competent human resources and in accordance with the required criteria. In this case to minimize or solve the problem, the author designed and built a system to help the agencies, especially Gunung Jati Regional Hospital (RSD) in terms of the selection of new employee admissions. The development of this system by analyzing two methods, namely Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method with Weighted Product (WP) method with the specified criteria. These two methods will be compared to get a good method and relevant to be applied in the selection of new employees at Gunung Jati Hospital so that the human resources received really match the needs of the agency. Analysis is carried out using the accuracy of each method by referring to the original data owned by the institution. The result of saw method conformity or percentage level is 99.959996% with an accuracy value of 84% and wp method of 99.959992% with an accuracy value of 76%. Thus the SAW method is the most relevant method to solve the problem of receiving new employees.

Utilization of the Weighted Product-Based CIPP Evaluation Model in Determining the Best Online Platform

“…The third formula for determining the V vector. The third formula is shown in Equation 3 [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32].…”

Decision Support System for Scoring In Informatics Engineering Practicum Assistant With Simple Additive Weighting (Saw) Method Web 2.0 Based

“…Penelitian lain yang juga terkait tentang Analisis Dan Perancangan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerima Bantuan Pangan Non Tunai (BPNT) Dengan Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Pada Dinas Sosial Kota Jambi mengatakan, Sistem yang dirancang menggunakan metode SAW (Simple Additive Weighting). Berdasarkan hasil uji coba dapat disimpulkan bahwa sistem ini telah sesuai untuk memproses mekanisme system penunjang keputusan warga miskin penerima BPNT yang sesuai dengan kriteria [6] Penelitian lain yang juga terkait tentang Analisis Perbandingan Metode Topsis Dan Saw Dalampenentuan Penerima Bantuan Pembangunan Rumahmasyarakat Kurang Mampu, Dengan pengujian sensitifitas bahwa metode yang paling optimal adalah SAW, dengan nilai perubahan SAW sebesar 14.65% sedangkan TOPSIS sebesar 4.02% [7]Penelitian lain yang juga terkait tentang Analisis Dan Perancangan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Guru (PKG) Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Pada SD Negeri 1 Wonoroto Berbasis Website, Sistem yang telah dibuat dapat digunakan untuk menyelesaikan pengambilan keputusan dengan beberapa kriteria yang akan menjadi bahan pertimbangan menggunakan Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) untuk mendapakan alternatif keputusan dengan nilai tertinggi [8] Penelitian lain yang juga terkait tentang Analisis Perbandingan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Dengan Metode Weighted Product (WP) Dalam Mendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Pegawai Baru mengatakan Berdasarkan pengujian nilai akurasi didapatkan nilai akurasi sebesar 84% untuk metode SAW dan 76% untuk metode WP, sehingga dengan demikian dapat dinyatakan bahwa metode SAW memiliki nilai akurasi lebih besar dibandingkan dengan metode WP [9] IV. HASIL DAN PEMBAHASAN Tahap implementasi dan pengujian dibagi menjadi empat bagian, yaitu implementasi data, implementasi proses, implementasi interface dan pengujian perangkat lunak.…”

Decision Support System for Property Insurance Selection Using Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Method

“…SAW can also be mixed with other methods to obtain optimal recommendations for a case. The use of the SAW and AHP methods for the selection of study programs [6], combining saw and wp methods for hiring new employees [7], and the use of the ANP method in determining the price of fire insurance premiums can make it easier to manage the calculation of fire premiums [8]. The selection of insurance products using the profile matching method compares individual competencies with job competencies [9].…”