2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2004.06.079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methane partial oxidation over Ni/CeO2–ZrO2 mixed oxide solid solution catalysts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
53
1
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
7
53
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The reduction peak with a maximum at 360 °C for Ni catalysts supported on CeO2-ZrO2 corresponds to the reduction of NiO interacting with the support. In the catalyst with higher Ni content (15Ni/CeZr), there is another reduction peak at lower temperature (with a maximum below 300 °C), that can be attributed to the reduction of free NiO species or with weak metal-support interaction [40,41], probably due to the high metal content in the catalyst.…”
Section: Physical Properties (N 2 Adsorption-desorption)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reduction peak with a maximum at 360 °C for Ni catalysts supported on CeO2-ZrO2 corresponds to the reduction of NiO interacting with the support. In the catalyst with higher Ni content (15Ni/CeZr), there is another reduction peak at lower temperature (with a maximum below 300 °C), that can be attributed to the reduction of free NiO species or with weak metal-support interaction [40,41], probably due to the high metal content in the catalyst.…”
Section: Physical Properties (N 2 Adsorption-desorption)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the reduction of supported NiO led to the appearance of several peaks in the H 2 -TPR profile. Usually this is assigned to different forms of metal-support interaction [75,78,79]. It is suggested [80] that higher NiO reduction temperature can be due to the presence of particles with higher dispersion, interacting stronger with the support, while the lower reduction temperature can be related to larger particles with a lower strength of interaction with the support (temperature of reduction closer to the pure NiO sample).…”
Section: Characterization Of the Catalystsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increase of a portion of difficultly reduced Ni 2+ species, as well as the increase of T 1 value corresponding to the weak interaction of Ni 2+ species with support, are found for Ni/SiO 2 /Ce 0.5 Zr 0.5 O 2 -3 catalyst, that are expected to have detrimental effect on its activity in the ATR of CH 4 . It was shown that the increase of both the reducibility of NiO and the Ni o surface dispersion resulted in a rise of CH 4 conversion [79,80,82]. Conversely, it was also concluded that NiO dispersed without strong interaction with the support had a high performance in methane partial oxidation, while in case of NiO dispersed with strong interaction between it and the support the catalyst had a high stability in autothermal reforming in the upper temperature range [83].…”
Section: Catalytic Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The desorption profiles of the reagent and product molecules arising from the reaction, CH 4 , H 2 , and CO, are plotted in Figure 3 for the two catalysts. Obviously, the Ni/CeO 2 NTA is decomposing methane in quite larger amount when compared to the Ni/CeO 2 mw catalyst.…”
Section: Catalytic Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of cost and availability, nickel is the metal of choice for such a catalytic reaction. Nevertheless, in order to avoid the drawback of an easy deactivation by carbon and metal sintering, various oxide supports were investigated [3][4][5][6]. When oxidation processes are involved, CeO 2 , in virtue of its peculiar redox properties, is a particularly good catalyst carrier [7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%