2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.09.115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methane enhancement through oxidative cleavage and alkali solubilization pre-treatments for corn stover with anaerobic activated sludge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

10
49
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
10
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various pretreatments (e.g., thermal, chemical, biological, and mechanical methods or various combinations of these methods) have been employed to break down the lignin structure to a certain extent and promote the hydrolysis of organic matter in the substrate [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. However, some pretreatment methods generate high costs due to the high consumption of energy and chemicals (biological agents) needed for maintaining the normal fermentation conditions, as well as byproducts that are not biodegradable, making the subsequent treatment of the biogas slurry more difficult and making the method impractical for biogas production [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various pretreatments (e.g., thermal, chemical, biological, and mechanical methods or various combinations of these methods) have been employed to break down the lignin structure to a certain extent and promote the hydrolysis of organic matter in the substrate [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. However, some pretreatment methods generate high costs due to the high consumption of energy and chemicals (biological agents) needed for maintaining the normal fermentation conditions, as well as byproducts that are not biodegradable, making the subsequent treatment of the biogas slurry more difficult and making the method impractical for biogas production [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among all chemically pretreated CRs, the CR treated with H 2 O 2 and NaOH for 1 h, followed by a mesophilic batch AD process, produced 66.27% and 57.18% more biomethane, respectively, than untreated CR of 187 L kg −1 VS biomethane. All other chemically treated CRs produced lower biomethane than these two, but 23-43% hemicellulose and 24-45% lignin were removed in these chemical pretreatments [40], which is a significant mass loss of the AD substrate. Steam explosion at 250 • C and 1.2 MPa for 10 min produced 55% more methane than untreated CR of 144 L kg −1 VS as the maximum whereas 1.5% KOH treated CR produced 45% more methane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The application of an alkali pre-treatment leads several advantages and disadvantages. On one hand promotes a high pH on feed mixtures, avoiding the anaerobic digester acidification (Reilly et al, 2015) are more effective on lignin removal (Ravidran and Jaiswal, 2016;Hassan et al, 2016), effective for the removal of hemicelluloses (Sun et al, 2016), causing less sugar degradation (Rabemanolontsoa and Saka, 2016). An important drawback of alkali treatments are the needing of applying high temperature to promote the hydrolysis which increases energy demand and removes part of hemicellulose, causing sugar loss (Rabemanolontsoa and Saka, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing different pre-treatments, the most effective is thermos-chemical procedures once they are easy and shorter time processing, increasing the biogas yield with lower energy consumption, promoting economic feasibility and higher bioconversion yields (Peces et al, 2015;Harris and McCabe, 2015;Hassan et al, 2016). Sodium hydroxide is the most popular base used in alkaline pre-treatment to remove lignin, hemicellulose, and/or cellulose, rendering lignocellulosic biomass more degradable to microbes and enzymes and has been extensively studied to improve biogas yield by increasing hardwood digestibility from 14 to 55% and reducing lignin content from 24e55% to 20% (Kumar et al, 2009;Minmunin et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%