2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.08.235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methanation of CO on Ru/graphitized-carbon catalysts: Effects of the preparation method and the carbon support structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it should be noted that the Ru3/C1 catalyst was not much more inferior to them in terms of the reaction rate, especially compared to Ru6/C2 (Figure 1a,c). The literature reports indicate an optimal size of ruthenium particles, guaranteeing the best properties in the catalytic hydrogenation of CO to methane [26,[32][33][34]. It seems that in our case, the size of the crystallites in the active phase is not the most important and only factor determining the activity of the system, despite the fact that it causes different electronic properties in very small Ru nanoparticles compared to larger ones [16].…”
Section: Co Chemisorptionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it should be noted that the Ru3/C1 catalyst was not much more inferior to them in terms of the reaction rate, especially compared to Ru6/C2 (Figure 1a,c). The literature reports indicate an optimal size of ruthenium particles, guaranteeing the best properties in the catalytic hydrogenation of CO to methane [26,[32][33][34]. It seems that in our case, the size of the crystallites in the active phase is not the most important and only factor determining the activity of the system, despite the fact that it causes different electronic properties in very small Ru nanoparticles compared to larger ones [16].…”
Section: Co Chemisorptionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…An increase in the activity of the Ru/C2 catalysts with time on stream may be attributed to the restructurization of small Ru particles (ordering of the crystal structure, faceting) to be more suitable for the structure-sensitive methanation reaction [25]. It may also be influenced by the functional groups on the surface of modified carbon materials [26]. It is generally known that they have a significant influence on the ruthenium reduction/oxidation state and the stabilization of its active, reduced form [27].…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Catalytic Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It benefits from the graphitization of carrier carbon and the successful doping of N element, which improved the conductivity and electron transport capability of the composite material. 40 Compared with the monometallic Ru/NGC-550-2, the introduction of Co showed higher activity. It may be attributed to the existence of electron transfer between the Co–Ru bimetals and the interaction between the metal particles and the support to jointly promote the catalytic activity of the catalyst.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The high stability of the catalyst was caused by the Ru nanoparticles embedded in these cavities ( Figure 3 ). Moreover, the partial graphitization of physical carbon enhances the conductivity and electron transfer ability of the support, which is conducive to the improvement of catalytic activity [ 107 , 108 ]. In order to achieve better catalytic hydrogenation performance, Wu et al [ 102 ] innovatively used rare-earth hydride as the hydrogenation catalyst carrier, and successfully developed a Ru/YH 3 -supported catalyst for the hydrogenation of NEC.…”
Section: Single-function Catalysts Of Lohcsmentioning
confidence: 99%