1998
DOI: 10.1006/icar.1998.5912
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meteoroid Morphology and Densities: Decoding Satellite Impact Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking the meteor density to be 3 g/cm 3 , this distribution yields masses between 10 −12 and 10 −6 g. Note that Evans (1966) used δ = 1 g/cm 3 to calculate the mass of the meteors. The range of our results will not change significantly if we use 1 g/cm 3 or other common meteor densities (Whipple 1952, Murrell et al 1980McDonnell et al 1998). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Taking the meteor density to be 3 g/cm 3 , this distribution yields masses between 10 −12 and 10 −6 g. Note that Evans (1966) used δ = 1 g/cm 3 to calculate the mass of the meteors. The range of our results will not change significantly if we use 1 g/cm 3 or other common meteor densities (Whipple 1952, Murrell et al 1980McDonnell et al 1998). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Other impact holes are more irregular in shape, like that in Figure 1d. These holes may be generated by particles with diameters much greater than the film thickness and may serve as a record of the particle's shape [McDonnell and Gardner, 1998]. Alternatively, they may be the result of damage to the impact site post impact.…”
Section: Imaging and Analysis Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…on the LDEF mission) has been used to characterize the flux of interplanetary micrometeoroids and man-made space debris particles (e.g. Brownlee, 1995, andMcDonnell et al, 1998).…”
Section: Size Distribution Of Meteoroids Obtained By Microcrater Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%