2005
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.20883
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metastatic transcriptional pattern revealed by gene expression profiling in primary colorectal carcinoma

Abstract: Metastatic spread to the liver is the major contributor to mortality in patients with colorectal carcinoma (CRC). In order to seek for gene expression patterns associated with metastatic potential in primary CRC, we compared the transcriptional profiles of 10 radically resected primary CRCs from patients who did not develop distant metastases within a 5-year follow-up period with those of 10 primary/metastatic tumor pairs from patients with synchronous liver metastases. To focus selectively on neoplastic cells… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
49
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
6
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the CSC model could shed light on the biology of metastases and explain why, despite extensive intratumor heterogeneity, comparison of paired samples of primary tumors and autologous metastases from the same patient frequently reveals high levels of similarity (19,(22)(23)(24). This observation is very well established in CRC and spans across diverse parameters, such as tissue morphology (19,25), repertoire of somatic genetic mutations (26,27), expression of tumor-suppressor and immunomodulatory proteins (28), and overall transcriptional profile (29). Indeed, if we assume that, in each individual CRC, the differentiation pattern is controlled by the specific repertoire of genetic mutations, we can predict that if two lesions share identical genetic backgrounds and similar genetic abnormalities they will also undergo similar differentiation programs and display similar patterns of intratumor heterogeneity in the expression of differentiation markers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Moreover, the CSC model could shed light on the biology of metastases and explain why, despite extensive intratumor heterogeneity, comparison of paired samples of primary tumors and autologous metastases from the same patient frequently reveals high levels of similarity (19,(22)(23)(24). This observation is very well established in CRC and spans across diverse parameters, such as tissue morphology (19,25), repertoire of somatic genetic mutations (26,27), expression of tumor-suppressor and immunomodulatory proteins (28), and overall transcriptional profile (29). Indeed, if we assume that, in each individual CRC, the differentiation pattern is controlled by the specific repertoire of genetic mutations, we can predict that if two lesions share identical genetic backgrounds and similar genetic abnormalities they will also undergo similar differentiation programs and display similar patterns of intratumor heterogeneity in the expression of differentiation markers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The biosynthesis of branched triantennary oligosaccharides is generated by glycosyltransferase GnT-IV in living systems and the change in activity of this enzyme has been described in connection with some cancers. 52,53 In a previous study of N-glycan alterations associated with drug resistance in human hepatocellular carcinoma, glycosyltransferase GnT-IV was reported to be either down-or upregulated in resistant cells depending on the drug used. 36 The evaluation of cell viability under the conditions described in this study, and the results presented in our previous report showed that lipoplex targeted samples resulted in more efficient delivery of the antibody into cancer cells and produced a higher growth-inhibitory effect than the monoclonal antibody alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…87,88 Moreover, gene expression profiles of the primary malignancy are similar to that of the metastases that arise from it. [88][89][90] However, a small amount of cells that accumulated the genetic mishaps to facilitate metastasis is not very likely to dominate the gene expression profile of the primary tumor. This implicates that those observations cannot be readily explained by the model described above that a small clone with metastatic capacity is responsible for metastatic spread of a tumor.…”
Section: Metastasis and Cancer Stem Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%