2011
DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2011.1154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metastatic suppressor CD44 is related with oxidative stress in breast cancer cell lines

Abstract: Abstract. Evidence has accumulated on the role of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in metastasis since surgical removal of tumors generates oxidative stress promoting metastasis and cell growth. Metastasis consists of a cascade of events which allow the cell to survive in target tissues and influence several processes such as dissemination from tumor tissue, transport in blood/lymphatic vessels, invasion and homing of malignant cells. A cDNA oligoarray was used to determine whether alterations of metastatic genes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although overexpression of CD44 correlates with bad prognosis in patients with most human cancers ( 151 , 178 184 ), it was also found that CD44 is extremely sensitive to changes in the microenvironment. For example, CD44 in breast cancer cells, neuroblastomas and prostate cancer may act as a metastatic suppressor gene ( 170 , 185 , 186 ), suggesting that the growth promoting pathways in these tumors are independent of CD44. These differential regulations should be considered carefully while designing CD44 as a target for therapeutic strategy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although overexpression of CD44 correlates with bad prognosis in patients with most human cancers ( 151 , 178 184 ), it was also found that CD44 is extremely sensitive to changes in the microenvironment. For example, CD44 in breast cancer cells, neuroblastomas and prostate cancer may act as a metastatic suppressor gene ( 170 , 185 , 186 ), suggesting that the growth promoting pathways in these tumors are independent of CD44. These differential regulations should be considered carefully while designing CD44 as a target for therapeutic strategy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CD44 is extremely sensitive to changes in the microenvironment. For example, CD44 in breast cancer cells may act as a metastatic suppressor gene when influenced by ROS, as seen by decreased CD44 protein expression in the malignant and tumorigenic breast cancer alpha 5 cell line in a compensatory response to increased manganese superoxide dismutase (MnSOD) protein expression ( 170 ). Studies by Stoop et al ( 171 ) showed that the cancer-initiating function in CD44-null mice was less severe, whereas the inflammatory functions were persistent in these mice suggesting again the possibility of a molecular redundancy in this model.…”
Section: Interaction Of Cd44 and Rhamm With Hamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elevated ROS generation is associated with alterations of metastatic genes in malignant breast cancer cell lines [41]. Previous studies show that ROS can activate downstream PI3K/AKT and ERK1/2 pathways that regulate HIF-1 and VEGF expression [42,43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many cancer treatments including radiotherapy and chemotherapy regimens involve the generation of free radicals (e.g., hydroxyl radical, hydrogen peroxide, and superoxide anion) to induce oxidative stress to kill cancer cells [1, 2]. While oxidative stress mechanisms play a key role in cancer treatment, high levels of free radicals may negatively impact breast cancer prognosis through several mechanisms, including genomic instability potentially leading to treatment resistance, activation of cell signaling pathways involved in tumor cell proliferation, and increased tumor cell migration and pro-angiogenic factors [1, 3, 4]. We hypothesized that high systemic levels of oxidative stress after completion of chemotherapy and radiotherapy may negatively impact breast cancer prognosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%