“…Although late Paleozoic and Indosinian igneous rocks are widespread further inland in southeastern South China, such as the Permian Wuyishan syenite (~254 Ma; Wang et al, ), potassic to calc‐alkaline Hainan granitoids (~290–260 Ma; Li et al, ; Li et al, ; Xie et al, ), the Shiwandashan granites and volcanic rocks (~260–230 Ma; Chen et al, ; Gao et al, ; Jiao et al, ; Li et al, ; Xu et al, ), and the Yunkai gneissic granites (~250–242 Ma; Peng et al, ; J. C. Zhou, Jiang, et al, ; X.‐M. Zhou, Sun, et al, ; Zhou et al, ), these Permian‐Triassic granites are unlikely important detrital sources for our Early‐Middle Triassic samples because (1) these igneous rocks have mainly negative zircon ε Hf( t ) values (e.g., Darongshan granites: ε Hf( t ) = −31.9 to −1.8; Jiao et al, ), distinct from the mainly positive ε Hf( t ) (~60%) values of the above‐mentioned Ailaoshan 280–237 Ma detrital zircon grains; (2) Proterozoic to early Paleozoic inherited zircon grains are common in these rocks (Chen et al, ; Jiao et al, ; Li et al, ) but absent in our samples; and (3) the intervening late Paleozoic‐Triassic Youjiang and Shiwandashan basins (east and southeast of Ailaoshan) would have likely barred the South China inland‐derived sediments from reaching Ailaoshan. In fact, the Lower‐Middle Triassic sedimentary rocks in the Youjiang and Shiwandashan basins are characterized by multiple detrital zircon age populations (Hu et al, , , ; Yang, Cawood, Du, Huang, & Hu, ; Figure ), clearly distinct from our Early‐Middle Triassic western South China samples.…”