2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.rasd.2020.101588
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metaphor comprehension in children with and without autism spectrum disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned, the hypothesis that issues in non-literal meaning comprehension related to world knowledge seems close to trivial in some cases (e.g., metaphor) and suspect in others (e.g., scalar implicatures). On the other hand, the simpler hypothesis that levels of structural language relate to levels in non-literal meaning understanding (excluding irony, some implicatures and some indirect requests) does not hold water: when autistic people are matched on linguistic skills with TD counterparts, they still perform worse on figurative meaning interpretation (Chahboun et al, 2017; Pastor Cerezuela et al, 2020). On the other hand, very small children are able to naturally use language in creative figurative ways (Poscoulous, 2014, p. 243), also when engaging in symbolic play and assigning imaginative roles to things (Hobson, 2012).…”
Section: The Structural Language Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As mentioned, the hypothesis that issues in non-literal meaning comprehension related to world knowledge seems close to trivial in some cases (e.g., metaphor) and suspect in others (e.g., scalar implicatures). On the other hand, the simpler hypothesis that levels of structural language relate to levels in non-literal meaning understanding (excluding irony, some implicatures and some indirect requests) does not hold water: when autistic people are matched on linguistic skills with TD counterparts, they still perform worse on figurative meaning interpretation (Chahboun et al, 2017; Pastor Cerezuela et al, 2020). On the other hand, very small children are able to naturally use language in creative figurative ways (Poscoulous, 2014, p. 243), also when engaging in symbolic play and assigning imaginative roles to things (Hobson, 2012).…”
Section: The Structural Language Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por otra parte, la hipótesis más simple de que los niveles del lenguaje estructural se relacionan con niveles de comprensión de significados no literales (excluyendo la ironía, algunas implicaturas y algunas solicitudes indirectas) no se sostiene. Incluso al agrupar a las personas con TEA y las personas con DN por habilidades lingüísticas, las personas con TEA siguen mostrando peor rendimiento en la interpretación de significados figurados (Chahboun et al, 2017; Pastor Cerezuela et al, 2020). Por otra parte, los niños muy pequeños son capaces de utilizar naturalmente el lenguaje de forma figurada con cierta creatividad (Poscoulous, 2014, p. 243), también cuando realizan juegos simbólicos y asignan roles imaginados a las cosas (Hobson, 2012).…”
Section: La Hipótesis Del Lenguaje Estructuralunclassified
“…Depending on cognitive development, metaphor provides a way of categorizing reality ( Carriedo et al, 2016 ; Pastor et al, 2020 ). Utilizing quantitative and descriptive behavioral experiment, the current study aimed to explore the underlying cognitive process of metaphorical comprehension.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para além do comprometimento na comunicação social, esses indivíduos também apresentam padrões restritos e repetitivos de comportamento, interesses ou atividades (APA, 2014). Na área da Linguística, diversos estudos teóricos e experimentais realizados sobretudo em língua inglesa abordam a compreensão de linguagem figurada por indivíduos com TEA a partir de inúmeras frentes e chegando a diferentes conclusões (Kalandadze et al, 2018;Kalandadze et al, 2021;Pastor-Cerezuela et al, 2020;Marques;Gibbs, 2016;Rundblad;Annaz, 2009, Vicente;Falkum, 2023). Entre esses estudos, apesar das diferentes metodologias e construtos teóricos, há um consenso de que populações TEA apresentam um comprometimento significativo em comparação a populações com desenvolvimento típico na compreensão de enunciados com sentido figurado, como metáforas.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified