2018
DOI: 10.31035/cg2018012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metamorphic petrology and geology in China: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most widely distributed rocks in the BTB are the Archean metamorphic Bayanwula Group and granites. The Bayanwula Group is composed of amphibolite‐facies rocks, which have been retrogressed into sericite‐chlorite‐hornblende schists and albite‐chlorite schists because of strong deformation, and the recently obtained isotopic data suggest that these rocks are Palaeoproterozoic in age (Geng et al, 2007; Li et al, 2004; Shen et al, 2005; Wu et al, 2014). While, the granites distributed in this belt mainly formed during ca.…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most widely distributed rocks in the BTB are the Archean metamorphic Bayanwula Group and granites. The Bayanwula Group is composed of amphibolite‐facies rocks, which have been retrogressed into sericite‐chlorite‐hornblende schists and albite‐chlorite schists because of strong deformation, and the recently obtained isotopic data suggest that these rocks are Palaeoproterozoic in age (Geng et al, 2007; Li et al, 2004; Shen et al, 2005; Wu et al, 2014). While, the granites distributed in this belt mainly formed during ca.…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ophiolites are generally missing from these orogenic belts, although fault-bounded slivers of mafic and ultramafic rocks, which have no meltresidua geochemical kinship or similar age brackets, occur in mélanges of subduction channel origin or in accretionary complexes (Isozaki et al 1990;MacPherson et al 1990;Terabayashi et al 2005;Langenheim et al 2013;Ogawa et al 2014). On the other hand, the latitudinal Tethyan orogenic belts exhibit well-defined suture zones with 5-10-km-thick, mostly suprasubduction zone (SSZ) ophiolites derived from the upper plates of N-dipping subduction zones (Dilek & Eddy, 1992;Dilek & Flower, 2003;Dilek et al 2007;Dilek & Furnes, 2009), thin or near-absent accretionary prism complexes and ultrahigh-pressure metamorphic rocks (Jolivet et al 2003;Geng et al 2018;Rehman et al 2018). The occurrence of complete, Penrose-type ophiolites (see Dilek, 2003a for definition) and ultrahigh-pressure metamorphic belts in those Tethyan orogenic belts was a result of the collisions of continent-facing, young (< 10 Ma in age) arc-trench systems, followed by the subduction and then exhumation of down-going continental margins, respectively (Dilek, 2003a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metamorphic facies is metamorphic rock group with similar condition which is characterized by a group of permanent mineral. According to Geng et al (2018) facies metamorphism in China is the outlined of the metamorphic rock map zone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%