1996
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00275-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metamerisms in Structure-from-motion Perception

Abstract: As a three-dimensional object is moving through our world, we generally obtain a vivid impression of both its structure and its motion through space. The time-course of two-dimensional projections of the scene (optic flow) is important in conveying this three-dimensional information to us. The extent to which we can solve this specific inverse problem, i.e. infer a three-dimensional scene from two-dimensional flow, depends on the accuracy with which the required flow characteristics are processed by our visual… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two points are worth mentioning here: (I) the dependence of slant on the tum is independent of the particular choice of pair A and B as long as these pairs are in the same plane, and (2) the relation between slant and tum is approximately inverse. This predicted relation is supported by psychophysical evidence (van Veen & Werkhoven, 1994).…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two points are worth mentioning here: (I) the dependence of slant on the tum is independent of the particular choice of pair A and B as long as these pairs are in the same plane, and (2) the relation between slant and tum is approximately inverse. This predicted relation is supported by psychophysical evidence (van Veen & Werkhoven, 1994).…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
“…Several researchers (Bennett, Hoffinan, Nicola, & Prakash, 1989;Koenderink & Van Doom, 1991;Kontsevich, 1993) have demonstrated how a one-parameter family of solutions can be found from two parallel views. Because the quantitative difference between parallel projection and perspective is negligible in many cases (small objects at about arm's length or farther away) and is often even objectively zero in typical laboratory setups (e.g., on discrete raster displays under the same viewing conditions), one cannot expect the visual system to do any better than to arrive at such a set of solutions (see also van Veen & Werkhoven, 1994). To arrive at a unique solution, extra assumptions have to be made about the specific surface transformation between projections or additional information has to be derived from other sources (e.g., from accommodation, familiar size, etc.).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Van Veen and Werkhoven (1996) asked participants to match two SFM stimuli consisting of small orthographic projections of horizontally slanted planes rotating about a vertical axis, by adjusting the simulated slant and simulated rotation angle of one of the stimuli. They found that adjusted slant and adjusted rotation angle were highly correlated for large slants and small rotation angles, but less so for large rotation angles and small slants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another indication that accelerations are used in SFM comes from experiments performed by Van Veen and Werkhoven (1996), in which participants matched SFM stimuli depicting slanted planes by simultaneously adjusting the slant and rotation angle of one of the simulated planes. The authors argued that the settings in the slant and the rotation should be highly correlated if only first-order information is processed.…”
Section: Accelerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a cloud has several characteristics, which we investigated separately. A similar method of data analysis was used by Van Veen and Werkhoven (1996).…”
Section: General Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%