2000
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.62.5496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metallurgical and low-temperature electronic properties ofM1xUxPd<

Abstract: In this paper, we compare the metallurgical and low-temperature electronic properties of the pseudo-binary alloy systems Sc 1Ϫx U x Pd 3 and Y 1Ϫx U x Pd 3 to gain insight into the nature of the non-Fermi-liquid ͑NFL͒ behavior observed in these systems at low temperatures. Our results show that both the Sc 1Ϫx U x Pd 3 and Y 1Ϫx U x Pd 3 systems exhibit similar NFL behavior, in spite of significant differences in their metallurgical properties. This comparison provides strong evidence that the NFL behavior is … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that Sc and Y are isoelectronic, this similarity may not seem surprising, but it should be noted that La 1Àx U x Pd 3 does not display Kondo or NFL behavior [3,5]. Practically, the significance of the correspondence between the Sc and Y compounds lies in the microscopic compositional inhomogeneity in Y 1Àx U x Pd 3 , which has complicated the interpretation of its physical properties [5,6]. In contrast, Sc 1Àx U x Pd 3 is metallurgically wellbehaved, making it possible to study the same NFL behavior in a homogeneous system [5].…”
Section: Sc 1àx U X Pdmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Given that Sc and Y are isoelectronic, this similarity may not seem surprising, but it should be noted that La 1Àx U x Pd 3 does not display Kondo or NFL behavior [3,5]. Practically, the significance of the correspondence between the Sc and Y compounds lies in the microscopic compositional inhomogeneity in Y 1Àx U x Pd 3 , which has complicated the interpretation of its physical properties [5,6]. In contrast, Sc 1Àx U x Pd 3 is metallurgically wellbehaved, making it possible to study the same NFL behavior in a homogeneous system [5].…”
Section: Sc 1àx U X Pdmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…After Refs. [49,52] χ(T ) to lower values of x. This is because the NFL features weaken rapidly with decreasing x since their magnitudes are proportional to x and their gradients decrease with increasing T K (decreasing x).…”
Section: Y 1−x U X Pdmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Given that Sc and Y are isoelectronic, this similarity may not seem surprising; however, La is also isoelectronic with Sc and Y, but La 1−x U x Pd 3 does not display Kondo or NFL behavior [49,52] [52] There has been some debate about whether the NFL behavior in the Y 1−x U x Pd 3 system is an intrinsic electronic property or an extrinsic effect associated with metallurgical inhomogeneity that several groups have reported is present in their samples of Y 1−x U x Pd 3 [59,60]. Whereas U is inhomogeneously distributed on a micron length scale in the Y 1−x U x Pd 3 system, U was found to be nearly homogeneously distributed in the Sc 1−x U x Pd 3 system [52]. However, in spite of the difference in their metallurgical properties, the Y 1−x U x Pd 3 and Sc 1−x U x Pd 3 systems have very similar T -x phase diagrams and NFL characteristics in their low temperature physical properties.…”
Section: Y 1−x U X Pdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, for URh 2 Ge 2 it has been shown that by varying the level of crystallographic disorder a transition from an antiferromagnetic to a spin glass ground state can be facilitated 22 . Further, in the alloying series U(Cu,Pd) 5 and (Y,U)Pd 3 spin glass ground states are suppressed to zero temperature, and are associated with NFL characteristics 13,19 . Consequently, if glassy states occur in a given class of compounds, we expect a behavior as sketched in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, in particular, studies have been performed on pseudo-binary cerium or uranium intermetallics with stoichiometries (Ce,U):T (T = intermetallic element) of 1:1, 1:2 or 1:3 10,11,12,13 , or ternary uranium heavy fermions like those of composition 2:1:3 14,15,16,17 , the U(Cu,Pd) 5 system 18,19,20,21 , or U-and Ce-122 compounds 22,23,24,25,26 . The goal of such material studies is the search for quantum critical behavior close to a magnetic instability, which might be accessed by tuning a magnetic transition temperature to zero through alloying.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%