2015
DOI: 10.1557/opl.2015.467
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metallic Binary Copper Chalcogenides with Orthorhombic Layered Structure

Abstract: Chalcogenide materials have regained attention after the recent recognition of the compatibility of transition metal dichalcogenides with graphene. Additionally, there has been a recent appreciation for the rich variety of properties they support due to the anomalies in the materials’ intrinsic band structure. These materials generally have layered structures and weak interlayer connection through the chalcogen layer and its van der Waals type bonding. We have synthesized orthorhombic copper telluride and meas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7,24 An effect of the numerous interfaces created by the fine microstructure (~200 nm) on the phonon transport cannot as well be excluded to explain this trend. Note that (a) the variability for t BM = 0 minute can probably be related to the extremely variable remaining glass fraction for these samples (Figure 9); (b) the fact that the thermal conductivity reaches 1.8 W/m/K, while the thermal conductivity of the Cu 15 As 30 Te 55 parent glass is about 0.22 W/m/K, or that of the α or β-As 2 Te 3 crystalline phase does not exceed 1.0 W/ m/K 24 and 1.4 W/m/K, respectively 7 , could be explained by the presence of additional metallic phases, viz., the Cu 1.4 Te rickardite 25 and AsTe. 22 On the other hand, the resistivity values are subjected to a larger sample-to-sample variability, which probably masks the evolution of this property.…”
Section: Volume Fractions Of Crystals Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,24 An effect of the numerous interfaces created by the fine microstructure (~200 nm) on the phonon transport cannot as well be excluded to explain this trend. Note that (a) the variability for t BM = 0 minute can probably be related to the extremely variable remaining glass fraction for these samples (Figure 9); (b) the fact that the thermal conductivity reaches 1.8 W/m/K, while the thermal conductivity of the Cu 15 As 30 Te 55 parent glass is about 0.22 W/m/K, or that of the α or β-As 2 Te 3 crystalline phase does not exceed 1.0 W/ m/K 24 and 1.4 W/m/K, respectively 7 , could be explained by the presence of additional metallic phases, viz., the Cu 1.4 Te rickardite 25 and AsTe. 22 On the other hand, the resistivity values are subjected to a larger sample-to-sample variability, which probably masks the evolution of this property.…”
Section: Volume Fractions Of Crystals Andmentioning
confidence: 99%