We report here that the low-temperature performance of graphite electrode is improved by adding a small amount of elemental sulfur (S 8 ) into the graphite negative electrode. The reversible capacity at −30 • C is much larger for the sulfur-added graphite electrode. The origin of this beneficial feature is examined through impedance analysis, which illustrates that the charge transfer resistance is much smaller in the sulfur-added graphite electrode at low temperatures. In the first lithiation step, the elemental sulfur is electrochemically reduced to be lithium polysulfide (Li 2 S 8 ), which is soluble in the working solvent (carbonate-based ones). Organic thiocarbonates are generated by the chemical reaction between the lithium polysulfide and carbonate solvents. The as-generated thiocarbonates are then electrochemically decomposed to form the sulfur-containing surface film. The superior low-temperature performance of the sulfur-added graphite is thus attributed to the presence of sulfur-enriched surface film, which seems to facilitate the charge transfer reaction between the graphite and lithium. Increases in oil prices and greenhouse gas emissions have increased the need for hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) and pure electric vehicles (EVs). Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are the most promising candidate for these applications due to their high energy and power density relative to other power sources. To market HEVs and EVs, a series of technical barriers in LIBs must first be overcome, one of which is the drastic decrease in reversible capacity at low temperatures.1 According to the U.S. Department of Energy, LIBs in power-assisted HEVs should function at −30• C and survive at −46 • C. 2 It has been reported that a commercial 18650 LIB delivers an energy density of only 5% at −40• C compared to the value at 20 • C. 3 It is well known that graphite, which represents the preferred negative electrode for LIBs, delivers poor electrochemical performance below −20• C. [4][5][6] The poor performance at low temperatures has been attributed to several factors; (i) increased viscosity and reduced Li + conductivity in electrolytes, (ii) sluggish Li + ion mobility in the surface films called solid electrolyte interphase (SEI), (iii) increased charge transfer resistances at the electrode/electrolyte interface, and (iv) reduced solid-state Li + diffusivity within the graphene sheets. Several approaches have been pursued to overcome these limitations, 4,6-8 one of which is the use of propylene carbonate (PC) instead of ethylene carbonate (EC) as the solvent. With PC, the conductivity problem can be somewhat overcome because the freezing point is lower for PC. Unfortunately, however, PC is not compatible with graphite electrode because of exfoliation problem.
9Electrolyte decomposition and film deposition are unavoidable in graphite negative electrodes because their working voltage is beyond the thermodynamic stability window of common organic electrolytes. The SEI film, which is formed at electrode/electrolyte interface, pas...