The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b02620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal Oxide-Based Tandem Cells for Self-Biased Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting

Abstract: Photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting represents a promising route to convert solar energy into clean hydrogen. Constructing tandem cells has emerged as a feasible approach and attracted tremendous attention for self-biased water splitting, especially using low-cost and stable metal oxides. Herein, a state-ofthe-art review of metal oxide-based PEC/photovoltaic (PV) tandem cells and PEC tandem cells is comprehensively presented, with a focus on crucial issues of designing efficient tandem devices from the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
147
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 147 publications
(267 reference statements)
0
147
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the band gap, there are other essential requirements that also need to be considered for efficient water splitting for hydrogen generation: the band edge positions with respect to the redox level of water, resistivity, minority carrier lifetime, atband potential, over-potential losses and stability of photoelectrodes against corrosion. [4][5][6][7] Metal oxide semiconductors are the most promising materials for the PEC reactions thanks to their excellent stability in many electrolytes over a wide pH range, low cost, non-toxic nature and their versatility in terms of fabrication techniques. [6][7][8][9] Among the various metal oxides, iron oxide (hematite; a-Fe 2 O 3 ) 10 is considered as one of the potential photoanode candidates for solar water oxidation, thanks to its unique properties such as a suitable bandgap (2.0-2.2 eV), low cost, non-toxicity and high stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…the band gap, there are other essential requirements that also need to be considered for efficient water splitting for hydrogen generation: the band edge positions with respect to the redox level of water, resistivity, minority carrier lifetime, atband potential, over-potential losses and stability of photoelectrodes against corrosion. [4][5][6][7] Metal oxide semiconductors are the most promising materials for the PEC reactions thanks to their excellent stability in many electrolytes over a wide pH range, low cost, non-toxic nature and their versatility in terms of fabrication techniques. [6][7][8][9] Among the various metal oxides, iron oxide (hematite; a-Fe 2 O 3 ) 10 is considered as one of the potential photoanode candidates for solar water oxidation, thanks to its unique properties such as a suitable bandgap (2.0-2.2 eV), low cost, non-toxicity and high stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][7] Metal oxide semiconductors are the most promising materials for the PEC reactions thanks to their excellent stability in many electrolytes over a wide pH range, low cost, non-toxic nature and their versatility in terms of fabrication techniques. [6][7][8][9] Among the various metal oxides, iron oxide (hematite; a-Fe 2 O 3 ) 10 is considered as one of the potential photoanode candidates for solar water oxidation, thanks to its unique properties such as a suitable bandgap (2.0-2.2 eV), low cost, non-toxicity and high stability. 4,[11][12][13] However, pristine a-Fe 2 O 3 exhibits poor water splitting efficiency, far below the maximum theoretical efficiency of 12.9%, because of the mismatch between the valence band energy level and the water reduction potential, the short hole diffusion length of 2-4 nm and the low electron mobility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting is a promising strategy to convert renewable solar energy into chemical energy for tackling the growing energy shortage and environmental crisis. In comparison with other energy conversion approaches, PEC water splitting stands out due to its low cost, environmental friendliness and easy separation of hydrogen and oxygen from water [ 1 , 2 ]. Unsatisfactorily, the energy conversion efficiency is hindered by the sluggish reaction kinetics which involves four electrons oxidation process [ 3 , 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Additionally, the other advantages of the wireless PEC tandem cell are the (i) flexibility in materials selection, (ii) low resistance losses and (iii) high proton conductivity, 5,6 which target for high solar-to-hydrogen (STH) conversion efficiency. 7 Furthermore, the wireless configuration is more suitable for industrial manufacturing in comparison to the wired tandem configuration in which the photoabsorbers are connected via an external circuit. 8 With respect to the TCS materials required for a PEC tandem cell, the most commonly used substrates are transparent conductive oxides (TCOs) such as fluorine/indium doped tin oxide (FTO/ITO) and aluminum doped zinc oxide (AZO).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Among the often studied metal oxide-based photoanodes such as TiO 2 , WO 3 , ZnFe 2 O 4 , BiVO 4 , the most representative one is the latter, 13 exhibiting the highest STH conversion efficiency of 3.7% in a bias-free tandem cell for PEC water splitting. 7 To achieve higher STH efficiency, the front photoanode in wireless tandem PEC cells has to be semi-transparent. Thus, it must absorb photons with energy larger than its band gap and transmit the remaining photons to the photocathode behind it, avoiding scattering or parasitic absorption of the transmitted light.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%