Metal-organic framework UiO-66 for rapid dispersive solid phase extraction of neonicotinoid insecticides in water samples

Metal–Organic Frameworks as Key Materials for Solid-Phase Microextraction Devices—A Review

“…Trying to establish certain parallelism, specific analytical applications have been targeted with the intended comparison purpose. Thus, Table 2 includes some operational characteristics and analytical parameters of different solid-based extraction methods using MOFs for two representative applications: the determination of pesticides (including organochlorine and organophosphorus pesticides) and drugs (covering antibiotics and anti-inflammatory drugs) in waters [48,65,72,78,129,141,[144][145][146][147]. These specific applications were selected for being those most commonly reported in the literature using the different SPME devices discussed in the present review article.…”

“…In any case, an important (if not main) advantage of the SPME approach over the remaining solid-based extraction methods lies in the extremely low amount of MOF used for the preparation of the SPME devices, which also provides impressive enrichment factors. MOFs amounts between 0.5 [145] and 40 mg [144,146] have been reported for µ-SPE, µ-dSPE, and m-µ-dSPE methods, while in the case of SPME, depending on the size of the device (length and thickness of the coatings), the maximum volume of sorbent used is around 2 µL. As for the volume of sample required, small volumes (10 mL as average) are required in all cases except for µ-SPE, for which a volume of 60 mL of water sample is needed to reach low LODs for the determination of drugs in waters, and this is despite the use of LC-MS/MS [146].…”

“…Given this simplicity, the automation of SPME regardless of the configuration of the device has been already reported for many applications. In any case, the greatest appeal of SPME is the reusability of the extraction device, which is never recommended for µ-SPE [146] and has been barely proven for µ-dSPE applications [144]. All these facts contribute to reduce the costs of the analysis per sample in the case of SPME.…”

Magnetic Solid Phase Extraction Based on Nanostructured Magnetic Porous Porphyrin Organic Polymer for Simultaneous Extraction and Preconcentration of Neonicotinoid Insecticides From Surface Water

“…Different types of analytical techniques including gas chromatography (Ai et al, 2010;Kiljanek et al, 2016;Balsebre et al, 2018), high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Wu et al, 2011;Giroud et al, 2013;Vichapong et al, 2015;Cao et al, 2018;Kachangoon et al, 2020) and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) (Bolzan et al, 2015;Kiljanek et al, 2016;Zhou et al, 2018;Hou et al, 2019) have been used for the detection and analysis of neonicotinoid insecticides in various samples. However, due to the intricacy of different sample matrices and the trace amounts of the neonicotinoid insecticides, sample clean-up techniques are required prior to instrumental analysis.…”

“…The benefits of sample preparation do not only involve sample clean-up, but also preconcentration of the target analytes (Farajzadeh et al, 2016;Vichapong et al, 2016;Moyakao et al, 2018;Kachangoon et al, 2020). Currently, several sample extraction techniques, such as cloud point extraction (CPE) (Kachangoon et al, 2020), liquid-phase microextraction (LLME) Jovanov et al, 2013;Bolzan et al, 2015;Vichapong et al, 2015;Hou et al, 2019;Kachangoon et al, 2020) solid-phase extraction (SPE) (Xie et al, 2011;Shi et al, 2017;Zhang et al, 2017;Cao et al, 2018;Moyakao et al, 2018;Xiong et al, 2018;Hou et al, 2019) and solid-phase microextraction (SPME) (Ding et al, 2019;Queiroz et al, 2019;Xue et al, 2019), have been reported for the extraction of the neonicotinoid insecticides in various samples. Among the SPE based methods magnetic solid-phase extraction (MSPE) has gained a lot of attention due to its attractive properties such as simplicity, rapidity, robustness, high enrichment factors, and environmentally friendliness (Deng et al, 2009(Deng et al, , 2019Wang et al, 2018b;Queiroz et al, 2019).…”