2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b05159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal-Labeled Aptamers as Novel Nanoprobes for Imaging Mass Cytometry Analysis

Abstract: Imaging mass cytometry (IMC) is an emerging imaging technology that exploits the multiplexed analysis capabilities of the CyTOF mass cytometer to make spatially resolved measurements for tissue sections. In a comprehensive view of tissue composition and marker distribution, recent developments of IMC require highly sensitive, multiplexed assays. Approaching the sensitivity of the IMC technique, we designed a novel type of biocompatible metal-labeled aptamer nanoprobe (MAP), named 167Er-A10-3.2. The small molec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The successful IMC imaging acquisition using MCPs(Ln)‐labeled A10‐3.2 aptamer probe has been previously demonstrated. [ 23 ] From the fluorescence imaging results, the B‐Cdots( 165 Ho)‐A10‐3.2 stained LNCaP cells showed stronger fluorescence intensity compared to the negative PC‐3 cells ( Figure 3 a ), indicating that B‐Cdots( 165 Ho)‐A10‐3.2 showed effective specific targeting ability. The Cy5.5‐A10‐3.2 stained LNCaP and PC‐3 in a side‐by‐side experiment was used as control (Figure 3b ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The successful IMC imaging acquisition using MCPs(Ln)‐labeled A10‐3.2 aptamer probe has been previously demonstrated. [ 23 ] From the fluorescence imaging results, the B‐Cdots( 165 Ho)‐A10‐3.2 stained LNCaP cells showed stronger fluorescence intensity compared to the negative PC‐3 cells ( Figure 3 a ), indicating that B‐Cdots( 165 Ho)‐A10‐3.2 showed effective specific targeting ability. The Cy5.5‐A10‐3.2 stained LNCaP and PC‐3 in a side‐by‐side experiment was used as control (Figure 3b ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…43 MUC1 aptamer or AS1411 can recognize and bind to MUC1 protein or nucleolin, respectively, which are highly expressed on the membrane of a wide range of cancer cells. When these aptamers were conjugated with polymers, 48 nanoparticles, 49,50 biomacromolecules, 51 or small molecules, 52 the obtained complexes could reach cancer cells selectively under the guidance of aptamers, confirming that the targeting and binding capacities of aptamers would be maintained well after a series of simple chemical modifications.…”
Section: Selection and Application Of Aptamers For Tumor Targetingmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…We first sought to investigate whether and to what extent metal-tagging affects antibody performance in in-gel immunoassays. For mass spectrometry imaging approaches (e.g., MIBI-TOF) the first step is to stain the sample with a panel of metal-tagged probes. , Therefore, to use MIBI-TOF as a detection method for single-cell immunoblotting assays such as scWB and scIEF, immunoprobing needs to be performed with metal-tagged primary antibodies instead of the conventional untagged primary and fluorophore-tagged secondary antibody probe duo. We hypothesized that metal-tagging may impact the physiochemical properties of an antibody molecule to the detriment of in-gel immunoassay performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%