1996
DOI: 10.1002/pssb.2221980130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal‐Insulator Transition in GaN Crystals

Abstract: By means of high-pressure Raman spectroscopy of coupled LO phonon-plasmon modes, a qualitatively new model of the metal-insulator transition observed in bulk GaN crystals at pressure around 20 GPa is proposed. This transition was interpreted recently as caused by the emergence of the localized donor state into the energy gap of GaN. Our new experimental evidence suggests that two types of donors can supply electrons to the bulk crystal: the first of a localized character and the second of a shallow character w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in line with the aforementioned significant relaxation of the epilayer after sample breaking. Moreover, the obtained pressure coefficients for the two modes lie between those reported in the literature for GaN {3.6-4.2 cm À1 ÁGPa À1 for E 2 2 and 3.8-4.4 cm À1 ÁGPa À1 for A 1 (LO)} [16][17][18] and InN {5.1-5.6 cm À1 ÁGPa À1 for E 2 2 and 4.8-6.0 cm À1 ÁGPa À1 for A 1 (LO)}, [19][20][21][22] suggesting the intermediate stiffness of the alloy. In fact, linear interpolation for x ¼ 0.37 between the mean values of the pressure slopes for the end members of the In x Ga 1Àx N system yields 4.5 and 4.6 cm À1 ÁGPa À1 for the E 2 2 and the A 1 (LO) mode, respectively, in excellent agreement with our results.…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
“…This is in line with the aforementioned significant relaxation of the epilayer after sample breaking. Moreover, the obtained pressure coefficients for the two modes lie between those reported in the literature for GaN {3.6-4.2 cm À1 ÁGPa À1 for E 2 2 and 3.8-4.4 cm À1 ÁGPa À1 for A 1 (LO)} [16][17][18] and InN {5.1-5.6 cm À1 ÁGPa À1 for E 2 2 and 4.8-6.0 cm À1 ÁGPa À1 for A 1 (LO)}, [19][20][21][22] suggesting the intermediate stiffness of the alloy. In fact, linear interpolation for x ¼ 0.37 between the mean values of the pressure slopes for the end members of the In x Ga 1Àx N system yields 4.5 and 4.6 cm À1 ÁGPa À1 for the E 2 2 and the A 1 (LO) mode, respectively, in excellent agreement with our results.…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
“…The direct bandgap energy and pressure coefficient were determined to be 0.873 eV at ambient pressure and +15.9 meV/GPa, respectively. The pressure coefficient is smaller than those of common semiconductors such as GaAs and GaN, 108 meV/GPa for GaAs and about 40 meV/GPa for GaN, respectively [14,15].…”
Section: P=270gpamentioning
confidence: 78%
“…17 The common pressure scale for all experiments was based on the position of the E 2 mode and then transformed to the pressure using published data. 18 While we were able to measure the E 1 (TO) mode in this experiment, we were not able to measure the E 1 (LO) mode because it is not allowed in the presently used backscattering geometry. Figures 1 and 2 show the measured spectra obtained in different Raman geometries.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%