Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1985
DOI: 10.1149/1.2114177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal Deposition‐Dissolution in Molten Halides: On the Question of Measurability of Very Fast Electrode Reaction Rates

Abstract: Metal deposition-dissolution reactions in molten salts are very fast and difficult to investigate, as evidenced by large discrepancies in the reported exchange current densities. An error analysis of the dc relaxation techniques was carried out, and it was determined that the measurement of the exchange current density can have a systematic error if the surface reaction rate is much faster than the diffusion rate. This systematic error will result in measured exchange current densities approximately equal to t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The order of magnitude of these results is similar to the lowest exchange current densities reported for mono and divalent elements in molten LiCl-KCl. [8][9][10][11][12] The reversibility at only the slowest scan rates and low activity coefficient of CeCl 3 supports a conclusion that significant molecular complexation occurs, and this may explain the observation of a low exchange current density.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The order of magnitude of these results is similar to the lowest exchange current densities reported for mono and divalent elements in molten LiCl-KCl. [8][9][10][11][12] The reversibility at only the slowest scan rates and low activity coefficient of CeCl 3 supports a conclusion that significant molecular complexation occurs, and this may explain the observation of a low exchange current density.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…RT F lnX agCl [11] Based on extrapolation of the data of Yang and Hudson 15 to the reference electrode concentration used in this work (0.0039 mole fraction AgCl), the potential of the reference electrode versus Cl À /Cl 2 is given by the expression E AgCl ¼ À0:9716 À 3:499 Â 10 À4 TðVÞ [12] Table III summarizes the experimental data obtained from open circuit potentiometry of a cerium rod or cerium deposited on a tungsten wire. Figure 10 shows the standard potentials computed from the experimental data of Table III, as well as literature data from several other studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where CTR is the total concentration in the reservoir. By using the relation that CTR = (CT)r=rL = 2/(Ye)r=r L, the above equation can be rewritten as a function of (XA)r=rL-The change of XA at r = r L with time is by i0.NF i = ~IN [23] RT In the matrix phase, the potential gradient is il = -%V4)1 [24] where i~ and 4~ are the current density and the potential in the solid matrix.…”
Section: V~mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dependency of the exchange current density on temperature can have linear form. 47 The results can provide data to model electrowinning at the liquid Bi electrode.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%