2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.endm.2012.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metaheuristic methods for solving the Bilevel Uncapacitated Facility Location Problem with Clients' Preferences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, there is an explosion of the related research on metaheuristics. Marić et al (2012) proposed three metaheuristic methods for solving FLPUP, i.e., Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Simulated Annealing (SA), and a combination of Reduced and Basic Variable Neighborhood Search Method (RVNS-VNS). To solve a large-scale bilevel FLPUP, Camacho-Vallejo et al (2014b) developed a population-based evolutionary algorithm (EA).…”
Section: Customersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, there is an explosion of the related research on metaheuristics. Marić et al (2012) proposed three metaheuristic methods for solving FLPUP, i.e., Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Simulated Annealing (SA), and a combination of Reduced and Basic Variable Neighborhood Search Method (RVNS-VNS). To solve a large-scale bilevel FLPUP, Camacho-Vallejo et al (2014b) developed a population-based evolutionary algorithm (EA).…”
Section: Customersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies that there could be a mismatch between the preferences of the customers and the desirable customer allocation/assignment of the operator. Therefore, when locating the facilities, the operator needs to consider this mismatch, giving rise to a variant of the FLP that is often referred to as the facility location problem with user preferences (FLPUP) or with order (Camacho-Vallejo et al, 2014b;Hansen et al, 2004;Marić et al, 2012;Vasil'ev et al, 2009;Vasilyev and Klimentova, 2010). When the number of facilities to be set up is fixed, the problem is called the P-median problem with user preferences (PUP) (Casas-Ramírez and Camacho-Vallejo, 2017;Camacho-Vallejo et al, 2014a;Díaz et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, due to the nature of the allocation problem, alternative exact methods can be easily adapted for solving it. For instance, in [14,15], an exact method based on the ordered matrix of preferences is considered for solving the bilevel version of UFLBP. However, the construction of efficient exact methods cannot be always obtained for solving the lower level problem; it clearly depends on its structure.…”
Section: Mathematical Problems In Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems that facility location and customers' allocation requirements can be effectively modeled with bilevel programming when taking into account the customers' demand at the facilities that will serve them. Various papers in which the customers are allocated to the facilities according to a predetermined list of preferences can be found in the literature; see [93][94][95][96]. In all those papers, the facility location problem under customers' preferences is studied.…”
Section: Bilevel Allocation For the Supply Chain Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the bilevel program induced, the leader has to locate some facilities, while the follower will allocate the customers optimizing their preestablished preferences towards the facilities. The first three papers (i.e., [93][94][95]) developed valid two-sided bounds for the objective functions invloved in this problem, and the last two works (i.e., [95,96]) implemented heuristic algorithms to process the bilevel model. Moreover, competitive facility location models have been approached with bilevel programming, too.…”
Section: Bilevel Allocation For the Supply Chain Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%