2017
DOI: 10.1002/jobm.201700137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metagenomic profiling of the microbial freshwater communities in two Bulgarian reservoirs

Abstract: Microorganisms inhabiting freshwater environments are an integral part of the aquatic ecosystems. Very few data are available regarding the profiles of the microbial communities in the reservoirs in Bulgaria, despite their key role in the biogeochemical processes. In the present study, we provide the first comprehensive metagenomic analysis on the planktonic bacterial diversity of two large and economically important Bulgarian reservoirs (Batak and Tsankov Kamak) using next-generation sequencing of 16S ribosom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Findings from Lee et al (2018) show similar results. In our study, the four strongest increasing phyla, i.e., Verrucomicrobia, Actinobacteria, Cyanobacteria, and Bacteroidetes, are all considered typical freshwater bacteria ( Newton et al, 2011 ) and have also been found previously in freshwater by Iliev et al (2017) and Kim et al (2018) and others. Patescibacteria were first reported in groundwater and sediments of anoxic environments ( Elshahed et al, 2005 ; Youssef et al, 2011 ; Wrighton et al, 2012 ), but showed to be widespread in most semiaquatic habitats ( Sánchez-Osuna et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Findings from Lee et al (2018) show similar results. In our study, the four strongest increasing phyla, i.e., Verrucomicrobia, Actinobacteria, Cyanobacteria, and Bacteroidetes, are all considered typical freshwater bacteria ( Newton et al, 2011 ) and have also been found previously in freshwater by Iliev et al (2017) and Kim et al (2018) and others. Patescibacteria were first reported in groundwater and sediments of anoxic environments ( Elshahed et al, 2005 ; Youssef et al, 2011 ; Wrighton et al, 2012 ), but showed to be widespread in most semiaquatic habitats ( Sánchez-Osuna et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In any case, as revealed and quantified by metagenomics, these variable allochthonous inputs in the Ganges River distinguish its microbial communities from their counterparts elsewhere, and dramatically alter both the taxonomic and functional composition in the river. While typical freshwater bacteria in rivers, including Betaproteobacteria , Actinobacteria , Bacteroidetes and Verrucomicrobia (Savio et al ., ; Newton et al ., ; Iliev et al ., ) were also detected, the Ganges River was distinct by possessing a higher abundance of Gammaproteobacteria , which often have fast growth rates on high organic substrate conditions (copiotrophs) such as sewage lagoons (Newton et al ., ). The higher allochthonous inputs rates of sludge/sewage altered microbial communities in Ganges River, especially in samples from the wet season and upstream.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bacteroidetes is the most dominant bacterial group in mesotrophic water bodies ( 29 , 53 ). Among Bacteroidetes , the distribution of Flavobacteriia and Sediminibacterium in YYL waters and their absence from TFL waters suggest that they thrive better in this environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microbiological studies have focused on the bacterial composition of lakes ( 29 , 34 , 39 , 55 ), in addition to other freshwater systems, such as rivers ( 32 ) and ponds ( 13 ). A recent review by Newton et al ( 38 ) provided detailed information on the bacterial communities of the epilimnetic waters of lakes worldwide, with Proteobacteria , Actinobacteria , Bacteroidetes , Cyanobacteria , and Verrucomicrobia being the dominant phyla.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%