2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2015.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metafroniter energy efficiency with CO 2 emissions and its convergence analysis for China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 196 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further research (Sheng et al [16]) found that the situation of total factor energy inefficiency in China has improved during the 15 years. The similar method has been adopted by Kaneko et al [18] and Li et al [13]. Although the non-parametric DEA has the advantage of envelope characteristics, it shows the limitation of excluding statistical noise.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Further research (Sheng et al [16]) found that the situation of total factor energy inefficiency in China has improved during the 15 years. The similar method has been adopted by Kaneko et al [18] and Li et al [13]. Although the non-parametric DEA has the advantage of envelope characteristics, it shows the limitation of excluding statistical noise.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researches [11][12][13] discussed multiple inputs and outputs based on the model of multiple input and single output. That means they combined undesirable outputs such as pollutant during production process into output system, which better simulated the byproducts in actual production process such as carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide and other industrial wastes.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Combining the SS-ML index and the meta-frontier analysis, Li and Lin [22] found that eastern China has the highest level of green development, followed by western China and central China.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Undesirable Outputs Production Inputs [34] GDP SO 2 , COD, Nitrogen Labor, capital, energy, water [35] GDP CO 2 Labor, capital, energy [36] GDP CO 2 , SO 2 Labor, capital, coal, crude oil, natural gas [37] Industrial added value CO 2 Labor, capital, energy [38] GDP Labor, capital, energy [39] GDP Waste water, waste gas, solid waste Labor, capital, energy [40] Industrial added value CO 2 , SO 2 Labor, capital, energy [41] Industrial added value NO 2 Capital, electricity [26] GDP CO 2 Labor, capital, energy [42] GDP CO 2 , SO 2 Labor, capital, coal, electricity [4] GDP CO 2 Labor, capital, energy [43] GDP CO 2 Labor, capital, energy [44] GDP Solid waste Labor, capital, coal [45] GDP, primary secondary and tertiary industry PM 10 , SO 2 , NO 2 Coal, oil, gas, electricity, energy investment [46] Industrial added value Waste water, solid waste Labor, capital, coal [22] Industrial added value CO 2 Labor, capital, energy [47] GDP SO 2 , solid waste Labor, capital, energy [48] GDP CO 2 , SO 2 , COD Labor, capital, energy [49] GDP CO 2 , SO 2 , solid waste, industrial dust Labor, capital, energy [50] GDP CO 2 Labor, capital, energy [6] GDP CO 2 Labor, capital, energy [51] GDP CO 2 , SO 2 Labor, capital, energy [52] GDP SO 2 , waste water, solid waste Labor, capital, energy …”
Section: Authors Desirable Outputsmentioning
confidence: 99%