2017
DOI: 10.5296/gjes.v3i2.11796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metadiscourse Markers in Pure Mathematics Textbooks

Abstract: The aim of this study was to investigate the use of metadiscourse markers in Mathematics textbooks. To achieve this objective, four chapters of A First Course in Abstract Algebra were selected for data collection. The results showed that interactive markers were more frequent than interactional markers. Among interactive markers, transitions were the most frequent. Logical, proof-based relationship among sentences in Mathematics textbooks is suggested to be the main reason behind the high frequency of transiti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is why the frequency of evidential markers which belong to interactive markers appears more in this study. In fact, as it has been acknowledged in similar studies (Banaruee et al, 2017;Mohamed & Rashid, 2017), interactive markers help to guide the reader through the text and lead the readers to understand through the application of transition markers, frame markers, endophoric markers, evidential, and code glosses.…”
Section: Raw Number %mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This is why the frequency of evidential markers which belong to interactive markers appears more in this study. In fact, as it has been acknowledged in similar studies (Banaruee et al, 2017;Mohamed & Rashid, 2017), interactive markers help to guide the reader through the text and lead the readers to understand through the application of transition markers, frame markers, endophoric markers, evidential, and code glosses.…”
Section: Raw Number %mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Zare-Behtash and argued that textbook reading activities must enjoy a great variety to serve as many learning preferences and styles as possible. The difference between models and descriptions are the results of the fact that learning is gained at different aspects (Banaruee, Mohammadian & Zare-Behtash, 2017). In the present study the efficacy of learning styles on L2 reading task performance results and their possible correlation is investigated and discussed.…”
Section: Review Of the Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meta-discourse is often considered as discourse or talk about the conversation that facilitates the interaction of authors and speakers with readers and listeners to better converter the author's message. As a universal feature of all languages, metadiscourse can reflect salient features of various genres and is also recognized as one of the most common methods for dealing with written academic texts [6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%