2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2008.08.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metadata-based heritage sites modeling with e-learning functionality

Abstract: Nowadays, cultural heritage is under threat and danger (pollution, natural disasters, wars, etc.). In this domain, cultural heritage management (CHM) as the art, vocation and practice of managing cultural heritage resources and as a multi-discipline research area has a vital role. In recent years, the innovations, improvements and rapid advances in traditional and geographic (GIS) databases, design computing, digital architecture and archaeology, imaging sensors and scanners, computer modeling software, haptic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are the conceptual representation, digital representation, and visual representation (Ahonen-Rainio, 2005;Laurini and Thompson, 1992;Worboys, 1995), and all of concern to a user of metadata. We propose a 3D modelling metadata structure based on the previous work carried out by Styliadis (Styliadis et al, 2009). First the data forming the basis of the modelling study are examined as primary metadata, then the principles of both the analysis and the restitution are presented (secondary and tertiary metadata), and finally the hypothesis formulation (fourth level metadata) and following the reconstruction hypothesis formulation (fifth level metadata) are documented.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are the conceptual representation, digital representation, and visual representation (Ahonen-Rainio, 2005;Laurini and Thompson, 1992;Worboys, 1995), and all of concern to a user of metadata. We propose a 3D modelling metadata structure based on the previous work carried out by Styliadis (Styliadis et al, 2009). First the data forming the basis of the modelling study are examined as primary metadata, then the principles of both the analysis and the restitution are presented (secondary and tertiary metadata), and finally the hypothesis formulation (fourth level metadata) and following the reconstruction hypothesis formulation (fifth level metadata) are documented.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for use in historic research, education and dissemination, the same operational format is not imperative. Though it has been argued that 'high modeling accuracy' is not required in models for archaeological hypotheses or architectural digital reconstructions (Styliadis et al, 2009), the premise of this paper is that it is accuracy that is paramount in these cases and that it is the need for an operational format that should be reconsidered.…”
Section: Case Study: Fethard Quaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests an approach to the subject where metadata-rich models would extend the data typologies suggested by Styliadis et al [29], which have much in common with physically-oriented building information models, to incorporate qualitative and socially-driven information. Cultural assets can exist across a spectrum from 'high culture', recognised and protected in most regions, with cultural historical significance to that of vernacular or industrial structures, which can equally provide insights into the societies and culture from which they emerged and in which they are part of the ongoing development of place specific cultural urban identities as basis for cohesion and communities [30].…”
Section: Laser Scanning and 3d Visualisationmentioning
confidence: 99%