Metacognitive awareness and the link with undergraduate examination performance and clinical reasoning

Abstract

Theory: Metacognitive awareness is a component of self-regulated learning and helps us to understand and control our thinking and learning. Thinking about thinking is also an important aspect of the clinical reasoning process for medical practitioners.Hypotheses: This pilot study researched the link between metacognitive awareness and undergraduate examination performance. The Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI) is a validated 52 item survey instrument for measuring metacognitive awareness. It has eight sub-scales grouped into two domains: Knowledge of Cognition and Regulation of Cognition. It was hypothesised that MAI scores would increase between first and fifth-year undergraduate medicine students and secondly that MAI scores would correlate with undergraduate examinations results.Method: Medical students at James Cook University, Australia were invited to complete the MAI and consented to give access to their examination scores. Results:The results of this pilot study found that metacognitive awareness was not significantly different between first and fifth-year undergraduates in this sample. For first-year medical undergraduates there were correlations between the Knowledge of Cognition domain and their end of year examination results, but not with the Regulation of Cognition domain. For fifth-year students there were correlations between both the Knowledge and Regulation of Cognition domains and their end of year examination results. Conclusion:This study identified that metacognitive awareness is not significantly different between first and fifthyear medical students. This may cause concern given that the study identified the importance of both MAI domains in undergraduate medical examinations. This study should be repeated on a larger scale and may confirm that raising metacognitive awareness levels among students is desirable. Increasing metacognitive awareness may raise Welch P, Young L, Johnson P, Lindsay D MedEdPublish

Promoting metacognition in an allied health anatomy course

“…This improvement in metacognition is consistent with previous studies, but generally, the literature remains inconclusive on the stage at which students typically improve their metacognition during health professional education (Siqueira et al, 2020). In previous studies with undergraduate medical students, MAI scores did not differ significantly over the span of an academic year (Hong et al, 2015) or between first-and fifth-year medical students (Welch et al, 2018). However, another study found that the MAI scores of medical students in their clinical phase were significantly higher than those of their pre-clinical counterparts (Turan et al, 2009).…”

Using a self-regulated learning-enhanced video feedback educational intervention to improve junior doctor prescribing

“…A number of studies, including this one, demonstrate that providing no feedback, or feedback without attention to SRL processes (including self-efficacy), is unlikely to improve learning (Reynolds et al 2016), and may provide individuals with a false sense of security about their development (Brinkman et al 2015), or lead to negative learning gains (Hattie and Timperley 2007). Helping novices calibrate their confidence with their actual competence is a major challenge for medical and healthcare professions education since there is a growing body of evidence that individuals are not developing this metacognitive capability within existing training programmes (Cleary and Sandars 2011;Mavis 2001;Welch et al 2018). For prescribing and other complex technical skills such as advanced life support, appropriate calibrations are necessary when junior doctors are working in practice, often alone without supervision, and need to make safe clinical decisions (Hautz et al 2019).…”

Towards a New Platform Based on Web 2.0 Technologies Supporting Collaborative Clinical Reasoning Behavior Skills

“…Thus, medical students need to develop this crucial capacity and strive to strengthen it in the professional context [8]. The development of clinical reasoning skills for medical students is a key objective of medical education [9]. Clinical reasoning can be improved by motivating students to participate more actively in learning activities [10] [11] and [12].…”