2007
DOI: 10.1177/193229680700100413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metabonomics in Diabetes Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(89 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…60 The most common analytical techniques used to characterize a microbial metabolome are MS and proton nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), each one with its respective advantages and disadvantages: NMR is a non-destructive, non-selective and costeffective approach, while MS offers better sensitivity and, if coupled to separation techniques (as LC or gas chromatography), it is capable of detecting a broader range of molecules. 61,62 Specific issues concerning metametabolomics analysis are due to the non-uniformity of the molecules to be profiled (spanning a broad range of hydrophobicity and molecular weights) as well as to the impossibility to directly link the particular metabolite detected to a specific microbial taxonomy. 51,63 The application of a systems biology approach -comprising metatranscriptomics, metaproteomics and metametabolomics -to the study of the milk microbiota in the years to come is expected to provide a much wider and sharper picture of the functional activity of milk microbial communities, compared to the information that one would infer from the DNA sequence alone.…”
Section: Microbial Communities and The Milk Microbiotamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…60 The most common analytical techniques used to characterize a microbial metabolome are MS and proton nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), each one with its respective advantages and disadvantages: NMR is a non-destructive, non-selective and costeffective approach, while MS offers better sensitivity and, if coupled to separation techniques (as LC or gas chromatography), it is capable of detecting a broader range of molecules. 61,62 Specific issues concerning metametabolomics analysis are due to the non-uniformity of the molecules to be profiled (spanning a broad range of hydrophobicity and molecular weights) as well as to the impossibility to directly link the particular metabolite detected to a specific microbial taxonomy. 51,63 The application of a systems biology approach -comprising metatranscriptomics, metaproteomics and metametabolomics -to the study of the milk microbiota in the years to come is expected to provide a much wider and sharper picture of the functional activity of milk microbial communities, compared to the information that one would infer from the DNA sequence alone.…”
Section: Microbial Communities and The Milk Microbiotamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the complexity of microbial–host exchanges may be reflected in the specific chemical signature of host circulating biofluids ( Nicholson et al, 2012 ). Metabolomics has recently attracted attention as the most suitable - omics technology for investigating complex, polygenic and multifactorial diseases with a strong metabolic etiology, such as obesity and T2D as well as the crosstalk of distinct predisposing factors in disease development and progression ( Faber et al, 2007 ; Llorach et al, 2012 ; Du et al, 2013 ; Kurland et al, 2013 ). Aimed at the comprehensive analysis of the low- molecular- weight compounds contained in a biological system –by definition, metabolites comprise a plethora of primary or secondary derivatives of the intermediate metabolism (molecular weight below 900 and 2000 Dalton, depending on sources; Beckonert et al, 2010 ; Psychogios et al, 2011 ; Hadacek, 2015 ) metabolomics represents a powerful tool for exploring the crosstalk between the microbial and host metabolism in a more exhaustive fashion.…”
Section: The Metabolomic Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both technologies have their advantages and disadvantages. 1 H-NMR implies a non-destructive, non-selective, cost-effective, and relatively sensitive analysis while, compared to 1 H-NMR, MS mainly offers potential advantages in terms of sensitivity and, if coupled to different separation techniques such as LC or GC, it provides a means of detecting a broader and complementary range of biomarkers ( Faber et al, 2007 ). LC coupled to electrospray ionization MS is becoming the method of choice for the acquisition of profiling metabolites in complex biological samples ( Scalbert et al, 2009 ) through both targeted (i.e., triple quadrupole-driven) and non-targeted (e.g., quadrupole time-of-flight-, linear trap quadrupole orbitrap-driven) approaches.…”
Section: The Metabolomic Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many targeted and untargeted metabolites profiling techniques capable of quantifying polar metabolites and molecular lipids present in biological samples, such as blood, urine and feces [ 15 ]. The most prevalent analytical techniques applied for the determination of the metabolic profile of a biological sample are liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS), gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) [ 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%