2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2004.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metabolizable energy requirements of lactating goats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
26
3
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
4
26
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The ME requirement for maintenance was calculated by the following equation: MEm (Mcal/day) = 110 kcal × BW 0.75 . The ME requirement for lactation was determined according to the NRC (1989) using an efficiency factor of ME utilization in the diet for lactation, according to Nsahlai et al (2004) by the following equation: MEl (Mcal/day) = (Milk production × (0.3512 + (0.0962 × % fat in the milk)))/0.589.…”
Section: Chemical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ME requirement for maintenance was calculated by the following equation: MEm (Mcal/day) = 110 kcal × BW 0.75 . The ME requirement for lactation was determined according to the NRC (1989) using an efficiency factor of ME utilization in the diet for lactation, according to Nsahlai et al (2004) by the following equation: MEl (Mcal/day) = (Milk production × (0.3512 + (0.0962 × % fat in the milk)))/0.589.…”
Section: Chemical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these probable reasons the ratio was lower than the recommended in all strata. Among herd indices, fertility was within the literature range for European breeds in the tropics (Castro, 1987), and produced daily milk averages per doe were low if compared to the productivity range of 1.9 to 4.4 kg/d that can be reached in the tropics by European breeds (AFRC, 1997;Knights & Garcia, 1997;Nsahlai et al, 2004). The proportion of primiparous to total does was not correlated with ADMP (r = -0.28; P = 0.12).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…where efficiency k NEÀi (Mcal NE/Mcal ME) for (i) maintenance is 0.68 [CV 5 11.5%; n 5 2 bovid and 2 cervid species; Robbins, 1993], (ii) activity is also 0.68 [based on similar efficiencies for sheep at rest as those exercised; Clapperton, 1964]; (iii) thermoregulation is also 0.68 [based on suggestion for cattle, sheep, goats, and cervids that efficiency is similar for maintenance and thermoregulation; NRC, 2000NRC, , 2007, (iv) gain is 0.53 when gain is positive [CV 5 11.7%; n 5 2 bovid and 1 cervid species; Robbins, 1993]; (v) lactation is 0.65 [typically observed or suggested value for cattle, sheep, goats, and cervids; Cannas et al, 2004;Nsahlai et al, 2004;NRC, 2001NRC, , 2007 …”
Section: Feedstuffs Other Than Milkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where efficiency k NPÀi (g NP/g MP) for (i) maintenance is 0.67 (typically observed or suggested values for cattle, sheep, goats, and cervids; Cannas et al, 2004;NRC, 2001NRC, , 2007Sahlu et al, 2004] Cannas et al, 2004;Nsahlai et al, 2004;NRC, 2001NRC, , 2007; and (vi) gestation is 0.33 is [value typically suggested or observed for cattle, sheep, goats, and cervids; NRC, 2001NRC, , 2007Sahlu et al, 2004]. For calculating NP when gain is negative, refer to Equation (21) above.…”
Section: Feedstuffs Other Than Milkmentioning
confidence: 99%