2019
DOI: 10.1111/liv.14184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metabolically healthy versus unhealthy obesity and risk of fibrosis progression in non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease

Abstract: Background & Aims Little is known about the impact of metabolically healthy obesity on fibrosis progression in non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We investigated the association of body mass index (BMI) category, body fat percentage and waist circumference with worsening of noninvasive fibrosis markers in metabolically healthy and unhealthy individuals with NAFLD. Methods A cohort study was performed on 59 957 Korean adults with NAFLD (13 285 metabolically healthy and 46 672 metabolically unhealthy ind… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our finding is consistent with those of previous studies, [37][38][39] Conversely, Chen et al found that by using FIB-4 score to evaluate the risk for advanced fibrosis, higher BMI was not a risk factor (OR, 0.72 [0.37-1.40]) and Miyaaki et al stated that although there were more obese cases in the group with severe fibrosis, the association was not statistically significant (mild:severe = 67%:78%; p = 0.23). 28 These findings were contrary to our study, which showed that the effect of obesity on more advanced fibrosis was significant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our finding is consistent with those of previous studies, [37][38][39] Conversely, Chen et al found that by using FIB-4 score to evaluate the risk for advanced fibrosis, higher BMI was not a risk factor (OR, 0.72 [0.37-1.40]) and Miyaaki et al stated that although there were more obese cases in the group with severe fibrosis, the association was not statistically significant (mild:severe = 67%:78%; p = 0.23). 28 These findings were contrary to our study, which showed that the effect of obesity on more advanced fibrosis was significant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…41 In addition, Kim et al reported that in sex-stratified analysis, fibrosis progression was stronger in men than in women (HR for BMI ≥30 kg/m 2 compared with BMI 18.5-22.9 kg/m 2 in men was 4.83 [4.31-5.43] and 3.49 [2.90-4.20] in women), which was opposite from our finding. 38 Their study composed of mainly premenopausal women, which estrogen may play a protective role, while ours are elder women with postmenopausal status. 29,38,42 In our study, there are some differences in the results of advanced fibrosis assessed by NFS and FIB-4 scores (Tables 2 and 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Nearly all of them (98%) had at least one metabolic dysfunction feature, with large WC and prediabetes being the commonest. A recent large Korean (n = 648) cohort study demonstrated that BMI was positively associated with worsening of hepatic fibrosis regardless of metabolic health status in patients with NAFLD 26 . Taken together, it seems to be reasonable to include overweight/obesity as a sole risk criteria in the MAFLD definition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As final consideration, the energy expenditure, observed in obese patients as a consequence of a systemic, low-grade, inflammatory process, may explain progression from obesity to MS, independent of the presence of NAFLD. I should point out that excess adiposity per se, even without accompanying metabolic health status, may contribute to fibrosis progress [49]. Recent data confirm that both FFM and FM are significant contributors to BMR [50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%