2002
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-002-1001-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metabolic mapping of the time-dependent effects of Δ 9 -tetrahydrocannabinol administration in the rat

Abstract: These data demonstrate that the functional consequences of acute administration of THC follow a distinct temporal course that is regionally specific. That functional activity remains depressed in areas involved in the processing of motivational and emotional information suggests that behaviors subserved by these structures (e.g. anxiety, stress, and reward) may remain altered for as long as 24 h after a single exposure to THC.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(34 reference statements)
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This regional profile of effects is largely in accordance with the distribution of CB1 cannabinoid receptors at which THC acts (Devane et al, 1988;Mechoulam et al, 1970;Glass et al, 1997;Herkenham et al, 1990Herkenham et al, , 1991a, and THC-induced alterations in activity in these areas have also been demonstrated in previous IEG and metabolic mapping studies performed in rodents (Bloom et al, 1997;ErdtmannVourliotis et al, 1999;Mailleux et al, 1994;Margulies and Hammer, 1991;McGregor et al, 1998;Whitlow et al, 2002). In addition, human imaging studies have consistently demonstrated marked alterations in activity in frontal brain regions following acute marijuana/THC intake or chronic marijuana use (Lundqvist et al, 2001;Mathew and Wilson, 1993;Mathew et al, 1997Mathew et al, , 2002O'Leary et al, 2000O'Leary et al, , 2002Volkow et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…This regional profile of effects is largely in accordance with the distribution of CB1 cannabinoid receptors at which THC acts (Devane et al, 1988;Mechoulam et al, 1970;Glass et al, 1997;Herkenham et al, 1990Herkenham et al, , 1991a, and THC-induced alterations in activity in these areas have also been demonstrated in previous IEG and metabolic mapping studies performed in rodents (Bloom et al, 1997;ErdtmannVourliotis et al, 1999;Mailleux et al, 1994;Margulies and Hammer, 1991;McGregor et al, 1998;Whitlow et al, 2002). In addition, human imaging studies have consistently demonstrated marked alterations in activity in frontal brain regions following acute marijuana/THC intake or chronic marijuana use (Lundqvist et al, 2001;Mathew and Wilson, 1993;Mathew et al, 1997Mathew et al, , 2002O'Leary et al, 2000O'Leary et al, , 2002Volkow et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In that kind of studies, a general reduction in glucose utilization after THC administration has been consistently reported Whitlow et al, 2002Whitlow et al, , 2003. However, in those experiments, the cannabinoid was always administered in the adult stage, and on the other hand, the drug used was THC and not CP.…”
Section: Adolescent Cannabis and Adult Cocaine Addictionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Several lines of evidence suggest that cannabis (marijuana, tetrahydrocannabinol [THC]) may alter functionality of the prefrontal cortex and thereby elicit impairments across several domains of complex cognitive function (Egerton, Allison, Brett, & Pratt, 2006). Several studies in both humans and animals have shown that cannabinoid exposure results in alterations in prefrontal cortical activity O'Leary et al, 2002;Whitlow, Freedland, & Porrino, 2002), providing evidence that cannabinoid administration may affect the functionality of this brain area. Despite the fact that a number of transient physiological, perceptual, and cognitive effects are known to accompany acute chronic marijuana (THC) exposure in humans, persistent qEEG effects in humans resulting from continuing exposure to this drug have been difficult to demonstrate (Wert & Raulin, 1986).…”
Section: Qeeg In Sudmentioning
confidence: 99%