The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-40381-1_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta-level Argumentation with Argument Schemes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is close to the approach adopted by [34], though the latter paper captures critical questions though the use of undercutting [39] rules, which (in our example) would deny the applicability of the transitivity rule rather than (as we do) ensuring that the argument generated using the rule is defeated. Of course, undercutting attacks are implicitly a metalevel notion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is close to the approach adopted by [34], though the latter paper captures critical questions though the use of undercutting [39] rules, which (in our example) would deny the applicability of the transitivity rule rather than (as we do) ensuring that the argument generated using the rule is defeated. Of course, undercutting attacks are implicitly a metalevel notion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 60%
“…As already mentioned, metalevel argumentation was formally introduced in [32], and the idea of metalevel argumentation has been used [31] to provide an abstract integration of accrual and dialectical argumentation and to integrate argumentation-based reasoning about preferences with the object level arguments. [44] presented an argumentation-based model of social interaction integrating both object-level and metalevel argumentation, and, as already mentioned, [34] integrated structured argumentation and metalevel argumentation to express argumentation schemes. Both these latter papers are a close fit with what we discuss here, though neither addresses our firewall domain.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper presents an approach for reasoning about trust in dialogues that combines three of the most popular mechanisms used within computational modelling of argumentation: ASPIC+ [10], argument schemes [12] and meta-argumentation [7,11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We map arguments and attacks in our hierarchical system to arguments and defeats in a bimodal argument graph [7] by stating that argument a defeats argument b iff a attacks b and there are some meta-arguments α, β such that α supports a and β supports b and α attacks β. Properties of the argument framework at the object level is encoded using a fragment of ASPIC+.…”
Section: The Object Level (L 0 )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation