2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-08421-8_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Burden of Persuasion in Meta-argumentation

Abstract: This work defines a burden of persuasion meta-argumentation model interpreting the burden as a set of meta-arguments. Bimodal graphs are exploited to define a meta level (dealing with the burden) and an object level (dealing with standard arguments). Finally, an example in the law domain addressing the problem of burden inversion is discussed in detail.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This denotes that the process of critically assessing the retrieved information sought to assist as one of the research techniques herein. Fundamentally, critically assessing the quality and reliability of these sources -which have been noted above -was central since this article is argumentative in nature and ensures the accuracy and credibility of the information used, strengthening the validity of the argument [10]. Over and above this, critically assessing this information helped the researcher hereunder to avoid misinformation and prejudiced content, maintaining the integrity and credence of their research, and fostering a more informed and persuasive discourse.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This denotes that the process of critically assessing the retrieved information sought to assist as one of the research techniques herein. Fundamentally, critically assessing the quality and reliability of these sources -which have been noted above -was central since this article is argumentative in nature and ensures the accuracy and credibility of the information used, strengthening the validity of the argument [10]. Over and above this, critically assessing this information helped the researcher hereunder to avoid misinformation and prejudiced content, maintaining the integrity and credence of their research, and fostering a more informed and persuasive discourse.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It must also be outlined outrightly, that this article is argumentative in nature, thereupon qualifying it as a conceptual scholarly discourse. An argumentative approach involves presenting a clear and well-supported claim or statements, backed by logical reasoning, and engaging in a critical analysis of counterarguments and alternative perspectives to strengthen one's position; ultimately aiming to persuade the audience of the validity and significance of the argument being presented [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%