2022
DOI: 10.1080/1750984x.2022.2042839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta-analyzing enhanced expectancies on motor learning: positive effects but methodological concerns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, the field of motor learning is not past asking whether self-controlled practice and enhanced expectancies have any benefit, so concerns about estimating the magnitude of a potential benefit are premature (Simonsohn, 2015). Thus, we urge any motor learning scientist(s) interested in clarifying whether self-controlled practice or enhanced expectancies boost motor learning to address the problems of underpowered and overworked study designs (Lohse et al, 2016) and the reporting bias revealed in the present meta-analysis and those by McKay et al (in-press) and Bacelar, Parma, Murrah, et al (2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nonetheless, the field of motor learning is not past asking whether self-controlled practice and enhanced expectancies have any benefit, so concerns about estimating the magnitude of a potential benefit are premature (Simonsohn, 2015). Thus, we urge any motor learning scientist(s) interested in clarifying whether self-controlled practice or enhanced expectancies boost motor learning to address the problems of underpowered and overworked study designs (Lohse et al, 2016) and the reporting bias revealed in the present meta-analysis and those by McKay et al (in-press) and Bacelar, Parma, Murrah, et al (2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning (Wulf & Lewthwaite, 2016) was established through study results showing that enhancing learners' expectancies and control over practice conditions improves learning and further supported by studies testing these hypotheses (Wulf & Lewthwaite, 2021). Two recent meta-analyses were conducted to appraise the evidential value of studies testing whether self-controlled practice (McKay et al, in-press) and/or enhanced expectancies (Bacelar, Parma, Murrah, et al, 2022) improve motor learning. McKay and colleagues' (in-press) meta-analysis found self-controlled practice benefited motor learning (g = 0.54) when using a naive random-effects model of published studies, but little a benefit was observed when a suite of bias correction techniques were employed (g's ranged from -0.11 to 0.26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This, in turn, motivated most participants to engage with the DVD-HEP routinely-thus suggesting why there was high adherence to the intervention in our current sample. The current trial adds to the growing evidence base on the potential efficacy of self-modeling videos of task mastery on improved motor performance in frail older adults in the community (64).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can draw on several learning theories, including the cognitive theory of learning ( 63 ), and the Optimizing Performance Through Intrinsic Motivation and Attention for Learning (OPTIMAL) theory of motor learning ( 64 ), to explain the current study's findings. Cognitive theorists would argue that it was likely that our tailored self-modeled DVD-HEP was designed to be situated within each individual's “ zone of proximal development” ( 63 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation