2017
DOI: 10.1037/bul0000126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta-analysis of the effect of natural frequencies on Bayesian reasoning.

Abstract: The natural frequency facilitation effect describes the finding that people are better able to solve descriptive Bayesian inference tasks when represented as joint frequencies obtained through natural sampling, known as natural frequencies, than as conditional probabilities. The present meta-analysis reviews 20 years of research seeking to address when, why, and for whom natural frequency formats are most effective. We review contributions from research associated with the 2 dominant theoretical perspectives, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
158
1
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 136 publications
(426 reference statements)
10
158
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…While experts from climate and environmental sciences may prefer to communicate GHG emission reductions in grams, others may find numerical format to be abstract, complex, and unfamiliar. Such communications may be further simplified by providing consumers with a single GHG emission value that they can use for comparison (Galesic et al 2016, McDowell andJacobs 2017), such as the GHG emissions associated with a medium-sized tomato (Camilleri et al 2019). Also, numerical formats like GHG emissions per calorie or average portion size (Camilleri et al 2019) might make communications about food-related GHG emissions easier to understand.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While experts from climate and environmental sciences may prefer to communicate GHG emission reductions in grams, others may find numerical format to be abstract, complex, and unfamiliar. Such communications may be further simplified by providing consumers with a single GHG emission value that they can use for comparison (Galesic et al 2016, McDowell andJacobs 2017), such as the GHG emissions associated with a medium-sized tomato (Camilleri et al 2019). Also, numerical formats like GHG emissions per calorie or average portion size (Camilleri et al 2019) might make communications about food-related GHG emissions easier to understand.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Explain probabilities . Conveying probabilities as relative frequencies instead of single‐event frequencies has been shown to help people comprehend uncertainty (Gigerenzer and Edwards, ; McDowell and Jacobs, ; but see Joslyn and Nichols, 2009 for the opposite finding in the weather domain). Descriptions in relative frequencies force the communicator to specify the reference class: “In 30 out of 100 days with a forecast like this , ...” rather than “The probability of X is 30%” (Murphy et al .…”
Section: Three Diverse Practical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important goal for future research is to explore how the bars technique can be integrated with other effective instructional techniques discovered by past research (Kurzenhäuser & Hoffrage, ; Ruscio, ; Sedlmeier & Gigerenzer, ; Sirota, Kostovičová, & Vallée‐Tourangeau, ). Perhaps the clearest conclusion one can draw from the Bayesian literature is that people perform better when problems are presented as nested frequencies instead of probabilities (see McDowell & Jacobs, , for a recent review), and using frequency‐based examples during instruction substantially improves learning outcomes in comparison to training on Bayes theorem with probability‐format problems (Kurzenhäuser & Hoffrage, ; Ruscio, ; Sedlmeier & Gigerenzer, ). Fortunately, the bars technique can be easily translated to frequency‐format problems with no essential change in the solution method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%