2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2017.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta-analysis of safety and efficacy for direct oral anticoagulation treatment of non-valvular atrial fibrillation in relation to renal function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
23
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The decline in renal function over time in our cohort was greater than previously observed in landmark randomised controlled trials comparing NOACs and warfarin in patients with non-valvular AF 4 8 11 12. In our analysis, the mean decline in CrCl during 24-month follow-up was −7.33 mL/min for NOACs and −6.36 mL/min for warfarin.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The decline in renal function over time in our cohort was greater than previously observed in landmark randomised controlled trials comparing NOACs and warfarin in patients with non-valvular AF 4 8 11 12. In our analysis, the mean decline in CrCl during 24-month follow-up was −7.33 mL/min for NOACs and −6.36 mL/min for warfarin.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Decline in renal function is common in patients with AF. A meta-analysis of four trials comparing the efficacy and safety of NOACs relative to warfarin showed that estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) declined in patients treated with either warfarin or NOACs (−3.66 mL/min/1.73 m² for warfarin; −2.54 mL/min/1.73 m² for NOACs at 30 months after randomisation) 4. Such declines are expected to be greater in routine practice as patients in clinical trials tend to be younger and healthier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these studies reported on renal function at the initiation of oral anticoagulants (OACs), and changes in renal function over time were not taken into account. 18 Previous studies showed that a significant proportion of AF patients, ranging from 21%…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…В мета-анализе 5 РКИ R. Zou и соавт. более детально дана оценка влияния НПОАК по сравнению с варфарином на эффективность и безопасность у больных неклапанной ФП в зависимости от тяжести почечной дисфункции, но также не включались пациенты с клиренсом креатинина менее 30 мл / мин [88]. При использовании НПОАК по сравнению с варфарином риск развития инсульта был достоверно ниже (ОР 0,79 при 95 % ДИ от 0,68 до 0,91) как у больных с мягкой (клиренс креатинина 45-59 мл / мин), так и у больных с умеренной (клиренс креатинина 30-44 мл / мин) дисфункцией почек (ОР 0,80 при 95 % ДИ от 0,69 до 0,92).…”
Section: выбор антикоагулянтов у больных C неклапанной фп и хбпunclassified