2009
DOI: 10.1001/archoto.2009.47
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta-analysis of Impaired Vocal Cord Mobility as a Prognostic Factor in T2 Glottic Carcinoma

Abstract: This meta-analysis indicates that impaired vocal cord mobility has a negative impact on local disease control and ultimate disease control in patients receiving primary radiotherapy for the treatment of T2 glottic carcinoma. We recommend that the subdivision of glottic cancer to T2a and T2b be reviewed and considered by the American Joint Committee on Cancer for inclusion in the Cancer Staging Manual.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
27
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
4
27
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The negative impact of impaired vocal cord mobility on outcome was also reported in the meta‐analysis of 35 studies, where significant differences in LC rates were seen, compared with normal mobility (OR 1.83, P < 0.001) …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The negative impact of impaired vocal cord mobility on outcome was also reported in the meta‐analysis of 35 studies, where significant differences in LC rates were seen, compared with normal mobility (OR 1.83, P < 0.001) …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The possible prognostic importance of impaired cord mobility in T2 glottic cancer[19] was evaluated by McCoul and Har-El[20] who pooled data from 21 reports and found a statistically better outcome in T2a disease. Our data confirm a prognostic difference based on substage, including a trend for better local control in T2a vs T2b disease, and significant differences in locoregional control, disease-free survival, and overall survival, but no differential effect by fractionation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our data is consistent with other published results that reported no prognostic significance on LC [23,24] . However, other studies, including a meta-analysis did suggest its adverse impact on LC [7,25,26]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%