2012
DOI: 10.1017/s175173111100228x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta-analysis of feed intake and growth responses of growing pigs after a sanitary challenge

Abstract: Sanitary challenges negatively affect feed intake and growth, leading to a negative impact on animal well-being and economic losses. The aim of this study was to carry out a meta-analysis to quantify the dynamic feed intake and growth responses of growing pigs after a sanitary challenge. A database was constructed using 122 published experiments reporting the average daily feed intake (ADFI) and the average daily gain (ADG) of pigs subjected to one of six sanitary challenges: digestive bacterial infections, po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
80
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
7
80
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The reduction in ADFI and ADG in poor sanitary conditions observed in this experiment agreed with conclusions from a recent meta-analysis (24% in ADFI and 210% in ADG, n 5 13 studies; Pastorelli et al, 2012). The higher faecal scores and the trend in phase II for a higher plasma concentration of haptoglobin in poor sanitary conditions indicated that the degradation of sanitary conditions may have affected the health of pigs.…”
Section: Responses Of Pigs To the Degradation Of Sanitary Conditionssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The reduction in ADFI and ADG in poor sanitary conditions observed in this experiment agreed with conclusions from a recent meta-analysis (24% in ADFI and 210% in ADG, n 5 13 studies; Pastorelli et al, 2012). The higher faecal scores and the trend in phase II for a higher plasma concentration of haptoglobin in poor sanitary conditions indicated that the degradation of sanitary conditions may have affected the health of pigs.…”
Section: Responses Of Pigs To the Degradation Of Sanitary Conditionssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In the aforementioned study of Pastorelli et al (2012), a reduction was observed in growth rate of about 16% for digestive bacterial infections, 10% for poor hygiene housing conditions, 12% for LPS challenges, 30% for mycotoxicoses, 8% for parasitic infections, and 16% for respiratory diseases. These authors also evidenced that growth depression in response to LPS challenges, mycotoxicoses, and respiratory diseases most likely results from the reduction in feed intake, whereas for digestive bacterial infections, poor housing conditions, and parasitic infections, it results mainly from increased maintenance requirements, changes in intestinal function, and changes in digestion and metabolism of nutrients.…”
Section: Voluntary Feed Intake and Growth Performancementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Pigs reared in commercial conditions are often exposed to sanitary challenges (poor hygiene conditions and pathogens) (Pastorelli et al, 2012). As a consequence, the immune system interacts with physiological regulatory mechanisms to maintain animal homeostasis and body integrity.…”
Section: Pig Responses To Sanitary Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The partition between these two effects was calculated using (1) the adjusted ΔG mean (obtained from previously fitted equations) and (2) the ΔFI mean observed in the database. A similar interpretation has been used in previous studies on health challenges (Pastorelli et al, 2012;Remus et al, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 84%