2018
DOI: 10.1177/0748233718757641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mesoporous silica nanoparticle is comparatively safer than zinc oxide nanoparticle which can cause profound steroidogenic effects on pregnant mice and male offspring exposed in utero

Abstract: The increasing use of nanomaterials has naturally caused heightened concerns about their potential risks to human and animal health. We investigated the effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) and mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSN) on steroidogenesis in the corpus luteum (CL) of pregnant mice and testis of male offspring. Pregnant albino mice were exposed to ZnO NPs and MSN for 2 days on alternate days, gestation days 15-19. Hepatic injury marker enzymes increased in the higher concentration of NM-expo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, inhalation exposure to TiO 2 NPs during gestation at the total doses of 0.5, 5, 50, and 500 µg did not affect the male reproductive function in two generations of male offspring mice [28]. The oral administration of ZnO NPs (50 and 100 mg/kg) and SiO 2 NPs (250 mg/kg) triggered alterations in spermatogenesis and pathological changes in testis, such as epithelial vacuolization, cellular adhesion of epithelia, and decreased seminiferous tubule diameter [59]. Similarly, Di Bona et al reported a charge-and dose-dependent effect on the reproduction of offspring by prenatal exposure to Fe 2 O 3 NPs.…”
Section: Reproductive Toxicitymentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, inhalation exposure to TiO 2 NPs during gestation at the total doses of 0.5, 5, 50, and 500 µg did not affect the male reproductive function in two generations of male offspring mice [28]. The oral administration of ZnO NPs (50 and 100 mg/kg) and SiO 2 NPs (250 mg/kg) triggered alterations in spermatogenesis and pathological changes in testis, such as epithelial vacuolization, cellular adhesion of epithelia, and decreased seminiferous tubule diameter [59]. Similarly, Di Bona et al reported a charge-and dose-dependent effect on the reproduction of offspring by prenatal exposure to Fe 2 O 3 NPs.…”
Section: Reproductive Toxicitymentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Metal oxide NPs. Previous investigations indicated that in utero exposure to ZnO NPs, TiO 2 NPs, Fe 2 O 3 NPs, and SiO 2 NPs affected male reproductive ability and the reproductive function of offspring [28,59,60,106,107]. The subcutaneous injection of TiO 2 NPs into pregnant mice resulted in alterations in spermatogenesis and impairment in the testis of offspring.…”
Section: Reproductive Toxicitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…An increasing number of studies is focusing on the male reproductive toxicity of SNPs [ 6 , 13 , 15 , 29 , 30 ]. SNPs can penetrate the mouse blood–testis barrier and exert their toxic actions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The toxic effect of SNPs on PLCs directly affects the development of the male reproductive system. Not surprisingly, abnormally high doses of SNPs reduced cell viability and increased cell apoptosis [ 30 ]. Although low doses of SNPs have no significant cytotoxicity in PLCs, their effect on testosterone synthesis and secretion is not known.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ALT levels significantly increased in male offsprings of albino mice prenatally exposed to 100 mg kg À1 ZnO-NPs for 2 alternate days. 58 Fourteen-day repeated oral administration of ZnO-NPs (5-2000 mg kg À1 ) induced an increase in the level of serum blood AST and ALT, in an inverse dose-dependent relationship. Thus, the low dose of ZnO-NPs is higher toxic versus high dose, suggesting the importance of particle density rather than conventional mass concentration dose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%