Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2021.103869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mesoporous activated carbon as a green adsorbent for the removal of heavy metals and Congo red: Characterization, adsorption kinetics, and isotherm studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The SEM images of CH as shown in Figure 2 (a, b) demonstrate dense, densely packed, uneven, rough pores and cavities. The SEM images of AF-CHAC after carbonization, chemical activation, and amine functionalization shown in Figure 2 (c, d) show the presence of more pores on the surface of the adsorbent material due to the removal of lignin, hemicellulose, and cellulose, as well as the addition of some functional groups, allowing for the easy transfer of adsorbates into the inner surface of the adsorbent material ( Mandal et al., 2021 ). The EDS analysis of CH as shown in Figure 2 (e), reveals the presence of elements such as O, C, H, S, Ca, Si, and Fe, whereas the elements present in AF-CHAC as depicted Figure 2 (f), include O, C, H, S, Ca, Si, and N, with a higher weight percent of C and O when compared to CH.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SEM images of CH as shown in Figure 2 (a, b) demonstrate dense, densely packed, uneven, rough pores and cavities. The SEM images of AF-CHAC after carbonization, chemical activation, and amine functionalization shown in Figure 2 (c, d) show the presence of more pores on the surface of the adsorbent material due to the removal of lignin, hemicellulose, and cellulose, as well as the addition of some functional groups, allowing for the easy transfer of adsorbates into the inner surface of the adsorbent material ( Mandal et al., 2021 ). The EDS analysis of CH as shown in Figure 2 (e), reveals the presence of elements such as O, C, H, S, Ca, Si, and Fe, whereas the elements present in AF-CHAC as depicted Figure 2 (f), include O, C, H, S, Ca, Si, and N, with a higher weight percent of C and O when compared to CH.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sample CFB was fabricated by a simple powdering of rough cuttlefish bone and subsequent sieving. The metal adsorption capacity of the adsorbents can be improved by various chemical treatments (Gendy et al 2021 ; Mandal et al 2021 ; Kurniawan et al 2006 ), leading to suitable functionality and porosity, which may affect the absorption efficiency of metal cations (Lam et al 2007 ). Thus, the CFB-D sample was prepared by treatment with NaOH solution, NaOH was chosen due to deprotonation effects and hence the surface charge on the adsorbent can be tailored by its reaction (Tanimoto et al 2004 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polymers induced the generation of adsorption active sites for CR, which in turn increased removal capacity. On the other hand, a comparison of relative adsorption using different adsorbent materials based on the literature is summarized in Table 4 [55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71].…”
Section: Adsorption Isothermsmentioning
confidence: 99%