1940
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(40)90829-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mesonephroma of the ovary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1955
1955
1980
1980

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Diseases of other organs, use of drugs, profession and social status could not be correlated with the appearance of the tumor. According to our study, the patients' complaints agree with those described in the literature (3,4,6,(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)18). T h e bleeding that appeared in one case occurred because of several changes in the uterus (patient no.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Diseases of other organs, use of drugs, profession and social status could not be correlated with the appearance of the tumor. According to our study, the patients' complaints agree with those described in the literature (3,4,6,(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)18). T h e bleeding that appeared in one case occurred because of several changes in the uterus (patient no.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…They were generally arranged in irregular, varying sized groups separated by connective tissue septa, but, in some tumors, they lined compact or widely dispersed tubular or papillary structures (Figs. 1,4). T h e degree of cytoplasmic clarity varied, and the nucleus was either centrally placed, eccentric, or not seen.…”
Section: Etiologic Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their possible origins from the mesonephric apparatus were explained and he termed them 'mesonephromas'. Since then, several accounts of these tumours have appeared together with hypotheses about their histogenesis (Jones and Seegar, 1940;Teilum, 1954;Novak, Woodruff and Novak, 1954;Novak and Woodruff, 1959;Parker, Dockerty, and Randall, 1960;Suprun and Soferman, 1960;Welch and Hellwig, 1960;Wade-Evans and Langley, 1961;Lee, Dockerty, Wilson, and Symmonds, 1962;Horowitz, 1964;Villa Santa, 1964;Fawcett, Dockerty, and Hunt, 1966;Scully and Barlow, 1967;Ross and Shelley, 1968;Saavedra and Sandow, 1968). These reports show that both the histological criteria and the hypotheses about their histogenesis have changed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%