1997
DOI: 10.30861/9780860548508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mesolithic Forest Hunters in Ukrainian Polessye

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(41) implies thatQ is decreased compared to Q = ( 2π 3 , 2π 3 ) for the ideal triangular lattice, whilẽ Q ≈ 2π · (0.357, 0.357) is observed in experiments. 13,14 Therefore, it is likely that the shift in RbMnBr 3 is mainly due to the anisotropic corrections to the nearest-neighbor coupling, which are captured already in the simplest row model. 8,9 Nevertheless, correction of Eq.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(41) implies thatQ is decreased compared to Q = ( 2π 3 , 2π 3 ) for the ideal triangular lattice, whilẽ Q ≈ 2π · (0.357, 0.357) is observed in experiments. 13,14 Therefore, it is likely that the shift in RbMnBr 3 is mainly due to the anisotropic corrections to the nearest-neighbor coupling, which are captured already in the simplest row model. 8,9 Nevertheless, correction of Eq.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1(c), and the one with n = 8 is relevant for the phases realized in RbMnBr 3 and KNiCl 3 . 12,13,14 In this case j q = 4j cos Q cos Q ′ +2j cos 2Q and it is easy to see that the energy of the modulated state is given by the same expression as for the frustrated square lattice, Eq. (40), but with j ′ = j and J ′ = J (as in the previous example, we use Q = q · (a1+a2) 2 and Q ′ = q · (a1−a2) 2 ).…”
Section: Generalized Row Models On Triangular Latticementioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In most general case, this results in a harmonic modulation of the exchange coupling. It has either the same wavevector Q c , if it appears as a first-order correction to J ij in small parameter ǫ ∼ ǫ1,2 rij ≪ 1, or the wavevector 2Q c , if it appears only in the second order, ∼ ǫ 2 , [19]. There is also a second-order correction to the bond energy,J ij = J ij + δJ ij .…”
Section: A Zaliznyakmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This corresponds to a bunched spiral [17,18,19]. Based on very general exchange symmetry arguments [18,19,20], in the absence of any additional symmetry breaking, the perturbing terms have to be proportional to the non-perturbed order parameter. As a result, the leading new Fourrier-components, S Q±Q c , are,…”
Section: A Zaliznyakmentioning
confidence: 99%