2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.enganabound.2015.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meshless modeling of natural convection problems in non-rectangular cavity using the variational multiscale element free Galerkin method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Petrov-Galerkin local meshless method was used to study natural convection in a porous medium [16], Wijayanta et al [17] analyzed a local radial basis function method to obtain numerical solutions of the conjugate natural convection heat transfer problem for square cavity. Zhang et al [18] tested the robustness and accuracy of the variational multiscale element free Galerkin method, another meshless method, on several cases of natural convection, including a semicircular cavity, a triangular cavity with a flat wall, and a zigzag shape. The results obtained in these studies clearly showed that meshless methods are stable, accurate, and efficient.…”
Section: Ramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Petrov-Galerkin local meshless method was used to study natural convection in a porous medium [16], Wijayanta et al [17] analyzed a local radial basis function method to obtain numerical solutions of the conjugate natural convection heat transfer problem for square cavity. Zhang et al [18] tested the robustness and accuracy of the variational multiscale element free Galerkin method, another meshless method, on several cases of natural convection, including a semicircular cavity, a triangular cavity with a flat wall, and a zigzag shape. The results obtained in these studies clearly showed that meshless methods are stable, accurate, and efficient.…”
Section: Ramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, numerical methods for solving transient heat conduction equations are broadly classified into two categories: mesh-based methods, including finite difference method (FDM) [1,2], finite element method (FEM) [3,4], Finite Volume Method [5,6], and Boundary Element Method (BEM) [7]; and meshless methods, such as the generalized finite difference method [8,9], smoothed particle hydrodynamics method (SPH) [10], meshless local Petrov-Galerkin method (MLPG) [11][12][13][14], meshless local radial basis function-based differential quadrature (RBF-DQ) [15], peridynamics (PD) [16,17], and peridynamic differential operator (PDDO) [18,19]. Based on time discretization, these methods can be divided into explicit and implicit schemes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advent of meshless methods has expanded the spectrum of numerical methods available, offering high flexibility in handling complex geometries (Sophy et al 2002 ;Zhang et al 2015 ;Jeyar et al 2022 ;Luo et al 2015 ;Najafi etal. 2014 ;Pranowo et al 2021 ;Sheikhi et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%