2012
DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2012.716829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meshless algorithm for soft tissue cutting in surgical simulation

Abstract: Computation of soft tissue mechanical responses for surgery simulation and image-guided surgery has been dominated by the finite element (FE) method that utilises a mesh of interconnected elements as a computational grid. Shortcomings of such mesh-based discretisation in modelling of surgical cutting include high computational cost and the need for re-meshing in the vicinity of cutting-induced discontinuity. The meshless total Lagrangian adaptive dynamic relaxation (MTLADR) algorithm we present here does not e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tissue cutting simulation is also difficult, as small and poorly shaped elements can be created during the cutting process. 24,54 Meshless methods of computational mechanics have been recognized as one possible solution for some of these challenges. 30 In particular, several meshless methods for surgical simulation have been developed, implemented and tested at the Intelligent Systems for Medicine Laboratory at the University of Western Australia.…”
Section: Beyond Finite Element Meshes: Meshless Methods and Models Asmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tissue cutting simulation is also difficult, as small and poorly shaped elements can be created during the cutting process. 24,54 Meshless methods of computational mechanics have been recognized as one possible solution for some of these challenges. 30 In particular, several meshless methods for surgical simulation have been developed, implemented and tested at the Intelligent Systems for Medicine Laboratory at the University of Western Australia.…”
Section: Beyond Finite Element Meshes: Meshless Methods and Models Asmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 In particular, several meshless methods for surgical simulation have been developed, implemented and tested at the Intelligent Systems for Medicine Laboratory at the University of Western Australia. 46,54,58 In meshless methods, the field variable interpolation is constructed without the use of a predefined mesh. These methods use a set of nodes scattered within the problem domain and on its boundary (Fig.…”
Section: Beyond Finite Element Meshes: Meshless Methods and Models Asmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SPH is not the only tool of this type available. Other methods, such as Peridynamics (Silling et al 2007) and the Element-Free Galerkin Method (Jin et al 2014) as well as the closely related Meshless Total Lagrangian Explicit Dynamics method (MTLED) (Miller et al 2012; Li et al 2016), may provide a good alternative to the method introduced in the current work. Note, too, that methods such as the one discussed here as well as MTLED lend themselves well to surgical simulations because of straight-forward spatial discretization as well as their algorithmic simplicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of these so-called "cracked particles" applies only to finely cracking solids and not to deforming soft bodies with arbitrary discontinuities, and the existence of discontinuities only at particular particles limits the accuracy with which they can be modelled. Level-set functions proposed by Osher and Sethian [5] and applied to FEM crack growth modelling by Stolarska et al [6], have also been applied to the problem of using meshless methods to model surgical cutting of brain tissue in two and three dimensions by Jin et al [7]. In two dimensions, discontinuities are represented by a series of straight line segments, each of which uses the vector between the segment's beginning and end to define a level-set function with values of opposing signs on opposing sides of the segment, and another such vector and level-set function perpendicular to the end of the segment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%