2012
DOI: 10.1039/c2sm25677k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mesh size distribution determination of interpenetrating polymer network hydrogels

Abstract: The importance of Interpenetrating Polymer Networks (IPNs) in biomedical and pharmaceutical fields is continuously growing because of their mechanical and drug carrier tailoring opportunities. This paper deals with the physico-chemical characterization of an IPN hydrogel based on calcium-alginate and a dextran methacrylate derivative. The attention is focused on the determination of IPN mesh size distribution. For this purpose, two different approaches were applied, namely using a combination of rheological an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
57
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
57
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The other approach to characterize the mesh size is to replace the true network with idealized spheres as suggested in the equivalent network theory . Radius of such spheres corresponds to the average mesh size, which is comparable to the results determined by the other methods .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The other approach to characterize the mesh size is to replace the true network with idealized spheres as suggested in the equivalent network theory . Radius of such spheres corresponds to the average mesh size, which is comparable to the results determined by the other methods .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Furthermore, by knowing T 2i and ⟨ℳ ⟩, ξ i can be calculated for each class of network meshes by eqn. (16): (16) Using this strategy, the ξ i values of 10% (w/v) 8armPEG10k-hydrogels were estimated. The value of ξ 1 , which represents about 91% of all network meshes, was found to be 5 11.1 ± 2.1 nm; the value of ξ 2 , which represents the remaining 9% of all network meshes, was 1.0 ± 0.3 nm (Table 1).…”
Section: Determination Of the Network Mesh Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,7 Other methods that allow the evaluation of the mesh size include confocal laser scanning microscopy, 8,9 small angle neutron scattering, 10,11 small-angle X-ray scattering, 12 and pulsed field gradient NMR spectroscopy. 13 Moreover, the mesh size distribution can be determined by differential scanning calorimetry [14][15][16] and low field NMR spectroscopy. 16,17 5 In this manuscript, we focus on the correlation between the mesh size of degradable, poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) based hydrogels and the release rate of macromolecules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pescosolido et al [31] using Eq. 8, where N A is Avogadro's constant, and ρ x is the crosslink density, given by Eq.…”
Section: +mentioning
confidence: 99%