Abstract:The aim of this study is to evaluate the therapeutic effect of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in a severe case of brain and multiple organ involvement in a patient with COVID-19. Here, a 51-year-old male patient with multi-organ involvement due to COVID-19 infection and developing cardiac arrest is presented. MSCs were transplanted to the patient four times systematically and once intrathecally. As a result, the application of MSCs has been found to have a healing effect on organs in this patient with severe CO… Show more
“…Abstract and full-text screening identified 22 studies with 371 patients to be included for the data extraction. All included studies were assessed as good [10,12,[22][23][24][25][26]32,35,36,38,39] or fair [13,[27][28][29][30][31]33,34,37,40] according to the NHLBI quality assessment tool (Table S2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Culture-expanded allogeneic MSCs were used in all 22 included studies. Allogeneic umbilical cordderived MSCs were used in studies [22][23][24][25][26]29,30,32,34,[36][37][38][39], Wharton's jelly-derived MSCs in three studies [12,33,40], menstrual blood-or adipose tissue-or placenta-derived MSCs were separately used in one study [10,28,35]. Four studies did not report the tissue origin of the MSCs [13,27,31,37](Table 3).…”
Section: Intervention Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eleven studies reported on baseline oxygenation indicators of patients [10,13,26,27,29,30,32,35,37,38,40]. General symptoms such as fever, cough, and dyspnea were reported in 16 studies [10,12,13,23,24,27,29,[32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40], and lung imaging evaluation showed COVID-19 related pneumonia in 15 studies [10,12,23,25,27,29,[32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40].…”
Section: Patient Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disease severity of the patient's condition was Critical (n = 63), Severe (n = 260), and Moderate (n = 10) in 19 studies [10,12,13,[22][23][24][25][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]36,[38][39][40]; and the patients in one study were divided into "Mild-to-moderate" (n = 6) and "Moderate-to-severe" (n = 18) according to the severity of ARDS [26]. The average age of study participants was 45.1 to 61.0 years for MSCs group and 39.0 to 65.0 years for control group in the comparative studies [13,[22][23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Patient Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common comorbidities including hypertension (HT, n = 105), diabetes mellitus (DM, n = 61), obesity(n = 19), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, n = 11), and heart disease (HD, n = 9) had been reported in 18 studies [10,12,13,22,23,[25][26][27][28][29][30][32][33][34][35][38][39][40]. There were also differences in the follow-up time after MSCs treatment in these studies, ranging from a week to two months, which mainly due to the point when patients were recovery or died and discharge from the hospital (Table 1-2).…”
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) therapy is considered one of the most promising treatments in the context of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. However, the safety and effectiveness of MSCs in the treatment of COVID-19-associated pneumonia patients need to be systematically reviewed and analyzed. Two independent researchers searched for the relevant studies published between October 2019 and April 2021 in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, WAN FANG, and CNKI databases. A total of 22 studies involving 371 patients were included in the present study. MSCs were administered in 247 participants, and MSCs were allogeneic from umbilical cord, adipose tissue, menstrual blood, placenta, Wharton's jelly, or unreported sources. Combined results found that MSCs group significantly reduced the incidence of adverse events (OR = 0.43, 95%CI. = 0.22~0.84, P = 0.01) and mortality (OR = 0.17, 95%CI. = 0.06~0.49, P < 0.01), and the difference compared with control group was statistically significant. No MSCs treat-related serious adverse events were reported. The lung function and radiographic outcomes, and biomarker levels of inflammation and immunity all showed improvement trends. Therefore, MSCs therapy is an effective and safe method in the treatment of COVID-19-associated pneumonia and shows advantages in less adverse events and mortality. However, a standard and effective MSCs treatment program needs to be developed.
“…Abstract and full-text screening identified 22 studies with 371 patients to be included for the data extraction. All included studies were assessed as good [10,12,[22][23][24][25][26]32,35,36,38,39] or fair [13,[27][28][29][30][31]33,34,37,40] according to the NHLBI quality assessment tool (Table S2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Culture-expanded allogeneic MSCs were used in all 22 included studies. Allogeneic umbilical cordderived MSCs were used in studies [22][23][24][25][26]29,30,32,34,[36][37][38][39], Wharton's jelly-derived MSCs in three studies [12,33,40], menstrual blood-or adipose tissue-or placenta-derived MSCs were separately used in one study [10,28,35]. Four studies did not report the tissue origin of the MSCs [13,27,31,37](Table 3).…”
Section: Intervention Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eleven studies reported on baseline oxygenation indicators of patients [10,13,26,27,29,30,32,35,37,38,40]. General symptoms such as fever, cough, and dyspnea were reported in 16 studies [10,12,13,23,24,27,29,[32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40], and lung imaging evaluation showed COVID-19 related pneumonia in 15 studies [10,12,23,25,27,29,[32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40].…”
Section: Patient Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disease severity of the patient's condition was Critical (n = 63), Severe (n = 260), and Moderate (n = 10) in 19 studies [10,12,13,[22][23][24][25][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]36,[38][39][40]; and the patients in one study were divided into "Mild-to-moderate" (n = 6) and "Moderate-to-severe" (n = 18) according to the severity of ARDS [26]. The average age of study participants was 45.1 to 61.0 years for MSCs group and 39.0 to 65.0 years for control group in the comparative studies [13,[22][23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Patient Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common comorbidities including hypertension (HT, n = 105), diabetes mellitus (DM, n = 61), obesity(n = 19), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, n = 11), and heart disease (HD, n = 9) had been reported in 18 studies [10,12,13,22,23,[25][26][27][28][29][30][32][33][34][35][38][39][40]. There were also differences in the follow-up time after MSCs treatment in these studies, ranging from a week to two months, which mainly due to the point when patients were recovery or died and discharge from the hospital (Table 1-2).…”
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) therapy is considered one of the most promising treatments in the context of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. However, the safety and effectiveness of MSCs in the treatment of COVID-19-associated pneumonia patients need to be systematically reviewed and analyzed. Two independent researchers searched for the relevant studies published between October 2019 and April 2021 in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, WAN FANG, and CNKI databases. A total of 22 studies involving 371 patients were included in the present study. MSCs were administered in 247 participants, and MSCs were allogeneic from umbilical cord, adipose tissue, menstrual blood, placenta, Wharton's jelly, or unreported sources. Combined results found that MSCs group significantly reduced the incidence of adverse events (OR = 0.43, 95%CI. = 0.22~0.84, P = 0.01) and mortality (OR = 0.17, 95%CI. = 0.06~0.49, P < 0.01), and the difference compared with control group was statistically significant. No MSCs treat-related serious adverse events were reported. The lung function and radiographic outcomes, and biomarker levels of inflammation and immunity all showed improvement trends. Therefore, MSCs therapy is an effective and safe method in the treatment of COVID-19-associated pneumonia and shows advantages in less adverse events and mortality. However, a standard and effective MSCs treatment program needs to be developed.
MSC (a.k.a. mesenchymal stem cell or medicinal signaling cell) cell therapies show promise in decreasing mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and suggest benefits in treatment of COVID-19-related ARDS. We performed a meta-analysis of published trials assessing the efficacy and adverse events (AE) rates of MSC cell therapy in individuals hospitalized for COVID-19. Systematic searches were performed in multiple databases through November 3, 2021. Reports in all languages, including randomized clinical trials (RCTs), non-randomized interventional trials, and uncontrolled trials, were included. Random effects model was used to pool outcomes from RCTs and non-randomized interventional trials. Outcome measures included all-cause mortality, serious adverse events (SAEs), AEs, pulmonary function, laboratory, and imaging findings. A total of 736 patients were identified from 34 studies, which included 5 RCTs (n = 235), 7 non-randomized interventional trials (n = 370), and 22 uncontrolled comparative trials (n = 131). Patients aged on average 59.4 years and 32.2% were women. When compared with the control group, MSC cell therapy was associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality (RR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.35-0.85, I 2 = 0.0%), reduction in SAEs (IRR = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.14-0.90, I 2 = 0.0%) and no significant difference in AE rate. A sub-group with pulmonary function studies suggested improvement in patients receiving MSC. These findings support the potential for MSC cell therapy to decrease all-cause mortality, reduce SAEs, and improve pulmonary function compared with conventional care. Large-scale double-blinded, well-powered RCTs should be conducted to further explore these results.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.