Merlin's Grin: From "Tom" to "Huck" in a Connecticut Yankee

Griffith, Clark

doi:10.2307/364911

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…30 "To the Editor of Free Russia" (Twain 1917, 2: 535-538). 31 Critics who most closely approach this interpretation of Hank include Foner 1958;Griffith 1975;Carter 1978;and Warren 1986. 32 See Zuckert and Zuckert 1972, 87 n. 83.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Connecticut Yankee in Saddam's Court: Mark Twain on Benevolent Imperialism

Johnson

2007

Persp on Pol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Is it acceptable (or perhaps even imperative) that the United States works to spread democratic liberty, even when nation building requires warfare on behalf of the oppressed? I argue that Mark Twain's novel A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court is a useful aid for reflection regarding this question. What Twain accomplishes, thanks in great part to his humor, is an honest exposure of the partial truths and considerable falsehoods contained in each common opinion regarding benevolent intervention. To highlight the complexity of Twain's thoughts on nation building, I discuss three possible interpretations of Connecticut Yankee. The first conceives of Hank Morgan as a well-intentioned democratic reformer, laying the proper foundation for a peaceful democratic transition after King Arthur dies. The second reads the book as ironically criticizing Hank for his overzealous promotion of democracy amidst a traditional culture. The third portrays Hank as an all-out revolutionary, justified in using any means to rid Camelot of slavery and oppression. Each of these interpretations represents, I believe, one aspect of Twain's outlook on the world. Brought together in the minds of thoughtful readers, these three themes prompt deeper reflection on the moral status of benevolent imperialism.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%