Web Reasoning and Rule Systems
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-72982-2_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Merging Model Driven Architecture and Semantic Web for Business Rules Generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We refer interested readers to Boley et al (2007) for more information. Rules, as a logic paradigm, are quite important, as they provide the capability of explaining why a particular decision is reached (Besnard et al, 2008;Diouf et al, 2007;Lehmann and Gangemi, 2007). This becomes possible by tracing back the inference chain of the executed rules and revealing the conditions and any intermediate data inferred during the reasoning process.…”
Section: • Normative Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We refer interested readers to Boley et al (2007) for more information. Rules, as a logic paradigm, are quite important, as they provide the capability of explaining why a particular decision is reached (Besnard et al, 2008;Diouf et al, 2007;Lehmann and Gangemi, 2007). This becomes possible by tracing back the inference chain of the executed rules and revealing the conditions and any intermediate data inferred during the reasoning process.…”
Section: • Normative Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such approaches do not exploit the full benefits of the abstraction. On the one hand, using UML, the UML meta-model and the Object Constraint Language (OMG, 2006) (OCL -used to increase expressivity of UML through allowing constraints to be defined) for ontology development is not preferable, since they do not offer automatic inference, and there is no notion of logic and formally defined semantics (Diouf et al, 2007;Noguera et al, 2010;Parreiras and Staab, 2010;Rodriguez et al, 2010). Available AI-based KR formalisms or logic programming languages (i.e., F-logic, OWL, etc.)…”
Section: A Merged Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the presentation in this paper, we concentrated on following business process language based on widely used standards: BPDM, ebXML, RosettaNet [19], BPML [3], XPDL [24], WS-BPEL [2], WSCDL [21] and OWL-S -one of the most widely accepted standards to describe the semantics of Web Services [6]. We can observe that none of the investigated approaches supports all requirements that should be addressed to facilitate business process interoperability [11] and the following can be concluded:…”
Section: Analysis Of the State Of The Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ontologies and rules also provide capability of explaining why a particular decision is taken (i.e. feedback) [44], for instance, providing learner with a dependency list or a prerequisite tree when learner wants to access a LO before completing all its prerequisites.…”
Section: A Domain Ontology and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%