1977
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1977.tb02527.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Merging Fieldwork and Survey Research in the Study of a Minority Community

Abstract: This paper directs its attention to a study of interminority hostility by joining two competing methodological traditions-fieldwork and survey research. I examine the following contributions of fieldwork to survey research in the study of black anti-Semitism: (a) selecting a suitable research site and sampling strategy, (b) generating theoretical clues, (c) garnering clues for data collection, and (d) analysis of data. In so doing, I am calling for a new style of research where both methods become the common m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1989
1989
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several researchers have recognized the difficulties that are often encountered when attempting to conduct scientific research of various types in communities and have pointed to potential solutions that can be initiated by researchers, such as acknowledgment of the mutual impact of ethnic and socioeconomic factors (Giachello, 1992); establishment of meaningful partnerships with community leaders and groups (Weiss, 1977); willingness among researchers to use research findings proactively to influence social change (Moore, 1977); provision of services, particularly to disadvantaged groups (Montero, 1977); understanding of community history in interpreting the data (McGraw, McKinlay, Crawford, Costa, & Cohen, 1992); awareness of the advantages and disadvantages of conducting research as an "insider" (group member) of a community (Zinn, 1979); sensitivity to the community's concerns when studying pathology or deviant behavior (Josephson, 1970); and use of novel methodologies for more accurate assessments (Mays & Jackson, 1991 ;Tsukashima, 1977).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several researchers have recognized the difficulties that are often encountered when attempting to conduct scientific research of various types in communities and have pointed to potential solutions that can be initiated by researchers, such as acknowledgment of the mutual impact of ethnic and socioeconomic factors (Giachello, 1992); establishment of meaningful partnerships with community leaders and groups (Weiss, 1977); willingness among researchers to use research findings proactively to influence social change (Moore, 1977); provision of services, particularly to disadvantaged groups (Montero, 1977); understanding of community history in interpreting the data (McGraw, McKinlay, Crawford, Costa, & Cohen, 1992); awareness of the advantages and disadvantages of conducting research as an "insider" (group member) of a community (Zinn, 1979); sensitivity to the community's concerns when studying pathology or deviant behavior (Josephson, 1970); and use of novel methodologies for more accurate assessments (Mays & Jackson, 1991 ;Tsukashima, 1977).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, some studies assess populations based on a survey alone, while other studies include field observations and community contact before implementing the survey (Tsukashima, 1977). Field observations may include focus groups and general (ethnographic) observations of the community as a whole.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is especially true within the African American community. If information is collected accurately but interpreted either incorrectly or inaccurately, this can lead to results that do not accurately depict the situation or population (Tsukashima, 1977;Weiss, 1977). For example, low usage of a medical facility in a community can be interpreted as the community not caring about their health, using it only for crisis situations, or simply not needing health care.…”
Section: Studying a Communitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way to develop this knowledge base is through the use of field methods, pretests, focus groups or ethnographic studies prior to the final development of the survey instrument. These methods may serve as useful ways to generate theoretical clues [7,21] to identify significant variables, to sensitize the researcher to the parameters of behavior under study, the nature of the community, language, norms and values of the respondents [13,[21][22][23][24]. Information from such sources is crucial to insure the integrity of the racial/ethnic/cultural gender differences in the data analysis and data interpretation stages of research.…”
Section: Designing Race/ethnic Sensitive Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%